Parents of dead teen vow to fight Florida's self-defense law

JACKSONVILLE, Florida Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:04pm EST

In a post-verdict press conference, Jordan Davis' parents, Lucia McBath and Ronald Davis speak to the media in Jacksonville, Florida February 15, 2014. REUTERS/Bob Mack/Florida Times-Union/Pool

In a post-verdict press conference, Jordan Davis' parents, Lucia McBath and Ronald Davis speak to the media in Jacksonville, Florida February 15, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Bob Mack/Florida Times-Union/Pool

Related Topics

JACKSONVILLE, Florida (Reuters) - The parents of Jordan Davis, a Florida teenager who was killed by a middle-aged man in a gas station dispute over loud rap music, plan to campaign to reform the state's self-defense law that they blame for their son's death.

"I expect Jordan would expect us to do what we are doing. To be a champion, not just for him, but for everyone," the teen's mother, Lucia McBath, told Reuters on Monday.

Michael Dunn, a white, 47-year-old software engineer, was convicted on February 15 on three counts of attempted murder for opening fire on a car of black teenagers during an argument in November 2012 in the parking lot of a Jacksonville gas station.

But the jury could not reach a verdict on a murder charge related to Davis' death. Dunn faces a minimum sentence of 60 years in prison and prosecutors say they plan to retry him on the murder charge.

Dunn testified that he feared for his life, drawing comparisons to the trial of George Zimmerman, the former central Florida neighborhood watchman who was acquitted last year of murder after saying he shot a 17-year-old unarmed black teenager, Trayvon Martin, in self-defense.

The parents of Davis and Martin plan to attend a rally protesting the state's "stand your ground" self-defense law in Tallahassee after the Florida legislative session opens on March 10.

They will also be joined by Nicole Oulson, widow of Chad Oulson, a Land O' Lakes man who was shot and killed by a retired Tampa policeman in a movie theater in January after a confrontation over texting.

The stand-your-ground law allows a person who "reasonably believes" they are in imminent fear of serious bodily injury to use deadly force to defend themselves, even if, despite their belief, no real threat exists.

The law was adopted in Florida in 2005 and has been copied in more than 20 states since then.

Civil rights groups and a handful of state legislators are urging a legal review of Florida's self-defense statute, saying it has created a license to kill for gun owners who hate or fear young black men.

But gun rights activists, backed by a Republican-controlled legislature, have resisted all efforts to undo the law.

Davis' parents said the law is too subjective, and allows gun owners to shoot on the slightest fear, even if only imaginary.

"What is reasonable to you? How gray is that?" said Jordan's father, Ron Davis, a retired Delta employee. "What was reasonable to Michael Dunn was certainly not reasonable to Jordan. He didn't reason that he was going to be shot and killed for what he said."

Dunn testified that he thought he saw Davis pick up a shotgun in the car after the teen mouthed off a barrage of expletives, but investigators said no weapon was found.

The law "leaves it completely open to people to interpret what that means, and laws should be concrete and definitive," added McBath, the mother of the teen slain over loud music.

McBath and Davis are divorced and shared custody of their son, though the boy lived with his father in Jacksonville for the last 18 months of his life. They spoke to Reuters in a joint interview at the office of their lawyer in Jacksonville.

McBath said her son always wanted to play all music loud. "He'd say, 'We aren't hurting anybody,'" she recalled ruefully. "'Let the music flow.'"

After the death of her son, McBath, a Delta airlines flight attendant who lives in Atlanta, became a national spokeswoman for Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, a non-profit group created in the wake of the Sandy Hook school shooting in December 2012.

"She is very involved in our chapter in Georgia. She's incredibly eloquent," said Shannon Watts, the group's founder. "She truly believes this happened for a reason. She believes it's her calling and what she's going to dedicate her life to," she added.

Taking on a political role felt natural after her son's death, she said. Her father Lucien Holman was the president of the Illinois branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and on the executive board of the national organization for years.

"I never expected that I would use those roots in this form and for this reason, but it is a very natural course for me," she said.

(Writing by David Adams; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
runfast3 wrote:
My question is when do you decide when it is self defence? These teenagers left the scene for about 5 or 8 minutes and then returned,at least that is what the news reported. Who knows where these kids disposed of the shotgun, or even if they had one. That is left to investigators who failed in their job by not securing the area and searching to see if they could find a gun.Slopy investigation……..just my opionion……

Feb 25, 2014 2:02am EST  --  Report as abuse
njglea wrote:
Thank You, Ms. McBath and Mr. Davis, for joining the fight to restore sanity in gun laws in Florida. Right now the “stand your ground if you feel threatened” law is simply a license to kill if you feel like it – and are a caucasian male.

Feb 25, 2014 9:31am EST  --  Report as abuse
borninthe80s wrote:
“Screw the kid”? C’mon man…I know you’re behind a computer screen, but at least try to act like a decent human being…

runfast3: Yeah I can agree with the sloppy investigation bit. I’m a gun owner, but I do have a problem when you give someone the latitude to make life-altering decisions, based on what they perceive as imminent danger. I feel like they’re taking the real purpose of the law (self-defense), and misconstruing the legislation to be able to cast “reasonable” doubt on cases that should not have had the benefit of using the SYG law.

Feb 25, 2014 10:09am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.