Kerry opens door to extended talks for Israeli-Palestinian deal

WASHINGTON Wed Feb 26, 2014 5:36pm EST

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry waves as he boards his plane to return to the U.S., at Le Bourget Airport February 21, 2014. REUTERS/Evan Vucci/Pool

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry waves as he boards his plane to return to the U.S., at Le Bourget Airport February 21, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Evan Vucci/Pool

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry acknowledged on Wednesday he hopes at best to get Israel and the Palestinians to agree on a "framework" for a peace agreement by April 29, but that a final deal could take another nine months or more.

Kerry brought the two sides back into negotiations on July 29 after a three-year gap and, at the time, said that "Our objective will be to achieve a final status agreement over the course of the next nine months."

As that deadline has approached, U.S. officials appear to have scaled back their ambitions, saying they are trying to forge a "framework for negotiations" as a first step though they still hope to hammer out a full agreement by April 29.

"For months now, we've been saying we're trying to get a framework. We have understood what we can get within this time period," Kerry told reporters in what appeared to be his most explicit admission that a final agreement is not possible by April 29.

"We are trying to get the framework ... If we have used these seven months thus far to get an understanding of where the parties are and to be able to shape the final negotiation, then we get into the final negotiation," Kerry added.

"So I don't think anybody would worry if there's another nine months, or whatever it's going to be, to finish up but that's not defined yet," he said.

While U.S. officials have declined to say what might go into such a framework, it appears likely to be a sort of outline of possible outcomes on the core issues of borders, security, the fate of Palestinian refugees and the status of Jerusalem.

Kerry, who met Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in Paris last week, declined to offer an assessment of where the talks are.

"I wouldn't be pursuing it if I didn't think it was worthwhile," he said. "I hope we are not wasting our time," he said.

"I hope very much that we are able to get both parties to do what is necessary to enter the most critical stage of this, which is the final phase, the final status negotiation ... around a framework which is clear and defined."

(Reporting by Arshad Mohammed; Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
TBellchambers wrote:
Final status agreement, from the Israeli side, means retaining the majority of the illegal ‘facts on the ground’ that they have so assiduously constructed in violation of the Geneva Conventions and in clear breach of international law.

The illegal settlements on the West Bank have been constructed specifically to retain the primary underground aquifer that supplies the main West Bank water supply and is intended to retain effective control of the occupied territory.

Any real peace agreement would need to stipulate the complete vacation of all illegal settlements. Tragically, this is unlikely to happen in view of Israel’s intransigence and there will almost certainly be a 3rd intifada as a result which will inevitably lead to Israel using its nuclear WMD.

Feb 26, 2014 5:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.