Kerry: U.S. must pursue Iran talks before considering going to war

WASHINGTON Wed Feb 26, 2014 5:41pm EST

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry speaks during a news conference in Tunis February 18, 2014. REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry speaks during a news conference in Tunis February 18, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Zoubeir Souissi

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States has an obligation to pursue nuclear negotiations with Iran before it considers going to war with Tehran to force it to give up its nuclear activities, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said on Wednesday.

"We took the initiative and led the effort to try to figure out if before we go to war there actually might be a peaceful solution," Kerry told a group of reporters.

Iran reached a landmark preliminary agreement with six world powers, including the United States, in November to halt its most sensitive nuclear operations, winning some relief from economic sanctions in return.

U.S. President Barack Obama, like his predecessors, has said that all options are on the table with regard to Iran's nuclear program, using diplomatic code for the possibility of military action. While U.S. officials have long held out that threat, Kerry's comments appeared to indicate that the Obama administration would seriously consider a strike on Iran if the diplomatic talks fail.

"I happen to believe as a matter of leadership, and I learnt this pretty hard from Vietnam, before you send young people to war you ought to find out if there is a better alternative," said Kerry, who served in the Vietnam War as a young U.S. naval officer.

"That is an obligation we have as leaders to exhaust all the remedies available to you before you ask people to give up their lives and that is what we are doing" with Iran, he added.

The Obama administration is under pressure from Republican lawmakers threatening to revive a bill that would impose new sanctions on Iran, a move the White House is warning could interfere with delicate nuclear talks to find a lasting agreement. Iran denies allegations by the United States and some of its allies that it is seeking to develop the capacity to build nuclear weapons.

Pressure from lawmakers may increase with signs that easing of sanctions pressure on Tehran has boosted oil export.

Sources who track tanker movements told Reuters Iran's oil exports rose further in February for a fourth consecutive month. In addition extra cargoes had headed to Syria and South Korea in February, according to a second tracking source.

(Reporting by Lesley Wroughton and Arshad Mohammed; Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
brutus9448 wrote:
Come on Kerry, if US really wanted to go to war with Iran it would have done it during the bush era. US won’t go to war with IRan and this talk of military action only makes negotiations harder.

Feb 26, 2014 6:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
SaveRMiddle wrote:
Sanction talks are delicate so Obama advises Puppet Kerry to publicly threaten war?

Maybe we need Putin to assist us with this too.

Feb 26, 2014 6:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
sabrefencer wrote:
the US going to war with Iran ,under Obama, is close to zero…Only, if the Iranians are really stupid, which they haven’t shown yet, will they force us into a shooting war..they know, if they should ever do that, they better get us with the first punch, as they will never be able to DO anything ever again..all they have to do, is what they are doing, lying, camouflaging, smiling, shaking hands, and building their bomb, day in and day out…tik tok! Obama, the EU, are todays” chamberlains….

Feb 26, 2014 7:05pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.