Syria says two attempted attacks on chemical weapons convoys: U.N.

UNITED NATIONS Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:52pm EST

A U.N. vehicle returns to a hotel where experts from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) are staying, in Damascus October 11, 2013 file photo. REUTERS/Khaled al-Hariri

A U.N. vehicle returns to a hotel where experts from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) are staying, in Damascus October 11, 2013 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Khaled al-Hariri

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - There were two attempted attacks on Syrian convoys transporting chemical weapons late last month, Syrian authorities told the international mission overseeing the removal and destruction of its toxic arsenal, according to a U.N. report on Thursday.

The monthly report to the U.N. Security Council of the joint mission of the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said the attempted attacks were on January 27. It gave no details on the location of the convoys.

"In addition, Syrian authorities indicated that ongoing military activities rendered two sites inaccessible during most of the reporting period," the five-page report said.

This delayed "in-country destruction of the final quantities of isopropanol, preventing some activities to consolidate chemical material into a reduced number of locations, and preventing the physical verification of chemical material prior to movement on 27 January 2014."

Isopropanol is one of two key ingredients for sarin.

President Bashar al-Assad agreed to destroy his chemical weapons following global outrage over a sarin gas attack in August, which was the world's deadliest chemical attack in 25 years. It sparked a U.S. threat of military strikes that was averted after Assad pledged to give up his chemical arms.

But the Syrian government, locked in a three-year-old war with rebels seeking to overthrow Assad, failed to meet the February 5 OPCW deadline to move all of its declared chemical substances and precursors - some 1,300 tonnes - out of the country.

Syria has now proposed a new timetable to remove its chemical weapons by late April, diplomats said on Wednesday.

'MEASURABLE PROGRESS'

The report said: "The elimination of the chemical weapons program of the Syrian Arab Republic stands at a critical juncture."

"While progress has been attained under challenging circumstances, it is clear the Syrian Arab Republic must further intensify and accelerate its efforts towards the full elimination of its chemical weapons program," it said.

Under the OPCW schedule, all Syria's declared chemical weapons must be destroyed by June 30. Most of the chemicals are supposed to be transported to the port of Latakia, where they will be shipped out of the country.

The United States has sent the MV Cape Ray, a ship outfitted with special equipment to neutralize the worst of Syria's chemicals at sea, and says it will need 90 days to complete the destruction.

"Measurable progress has been made over the last months in the destruction of critical equipment and special features at a number of chemical weapons production facilities, as well as unfilled chemical munitions," the report said. "As a result, the production, mixing and filling capabilities of the Syrian Arab Republic have been rendered inoperable."

The deal for Syria to give up its chemical weapons, brokered by the United States and Russia, was enshrined in a U.N. Security Council resolution in September.

The resolution does not authorize automatic punitive action in the form of military strikes or sanctions if Syria does not comply. At Russia's insistence, the resolution makes clear a second council decision would be needed for that.

Russia has made clear, however, it would not support the use of force against Assad's government, a close ally.

(Reporting by Michelle Nichols; editing by Gunna Dickson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Does anyone believe Syria will give up everything, and keep no secret stashes?

Feb 27, 2014 9:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
cirrus7 wrote:
ANOTHER poor Reuters job.
As EVERYONE knows, isopropanol is isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alchol).

“They are the same substance. HOWEVER, “isopropanol” is an incorrect mix of two different naming systems. The “ol” suffix is part of the IUPAC system of nomenclature. The “iso” prefix is part of the common system of nomenclature. The two systems should not be mixed together.”

That would not surprise me, Assad handing over 100 tons of rubbing alcohol but not 700 tons of Sarin, VX and Mustard gas.

Feb 27, 2014 10:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
RobertFrost wrote:
It is quite clear that the Syrians had no intention of using their chemical weapons. If they did, a Third World War would have already started and most of humanity would have been wiped out.

The fact that they were all to ready to deflate the US administration’s by offering to deliver them ‘pronto’ validates their statement about their long-held intention to dispose of them!

What is clear is that the armed groups were not prepared for that, as they, without doubt, used some in that location near their capital, which analysis by independent specialists (at MIT) verified the Syrian claim of innocence!

So what exactly is gained by going back to a dead event, a beating a dead horse?

Merely political – and not much is gained by it either!

Well, the horse is dead, and gladly, he or she cannot feel the lashes of the whip – although it is rather bizarre!.

Feb 27, 2014 10:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures