Obama's dilemma: boosting domestic initiatives without adding to deficit

WASHINGTON Sun Mar 2, 2014 12:57pm EST

A worker walks while repairing the road at Times Square in New York December 13, 2013. REUTERS/Eric Thayer

A worker walks while repairing the road at Times Square in New York December 13, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Eric Thayer

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama will unveil a budget this week that seeks to boost spending on new initiatives such as road repairs, education programs and tax breaks for the working poor while avoiding an increase in U.S. deficits.

Obama has made reducing the gap between the rich and the poor a centerpiece of his agenda for his next three years in office. But he is limited in his ability to offer bold new initiatives because of a budget accord he reached in 2011 with House of Representatives Republicans that puts strict curbs on both domestic and military spending.

An agreement reached in December between congressional Republicans and Obama's Democrats allowed a slight easing of curbs on spending in the current 2014 fiscal year, but outlays will be essentially flat in fiscal 2015, which begins October 1.

Because of the caps, spending on programs subject to annual review in 2015 will total $1.014 trillion compared to $1.012 trillion - an increase of less than two-tenths of a percent.

Obama's budget and the coming debate in Congress will focus on how to work within those limits.

"We're on track to having discretionary spending the lowest as a share of the economy since we started recording discretionary spending in 1962," White House Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Jason Furman said last week. "With that comes a lot of choices that we'd rather not be making ... there are pretty difficult choices in just about every area of the budget."

Even with only a minuscule spending increase, Obama's budget proposals are unlikely to become law anytime soon.

The divided U.S. Congress controls the government's purse strings and Republicans who hold power in the House of Representatives disagree with policy priorities such as added spending on job training and other programs in Obama's budget.

That means Obama's blueprint is more of a campaign document than a road map to the country's fiscal path over the next year. It will be used to guide messaging in the November congressional elections in which Democrats are fighting to keep control of the Senate and avoid losing seats in the House.

The budget will flesh out a proposal Obama made in his State of the Union address to expand a tax break for the working poor known as the Earned Income Tax Credit. The president wants to increase the size of the credit for workers without children.

The credit, which has been in place since the mid-1970s, is meant to give low-income workers an incentive to work rather than receive government handouts. But it is substantially more generous for workers with children. Those with at least one child can receive up to $3,305 in 2014, while the maximum for childless workers is $496.

The benefit also begins to phase out at a much lower income level for childless workers - as soon as $8,810, as opposed to at $17,830 for a worker with one child.

"It will be a strong antipoverty measure," said Jared Bernstein, a former economic aide to Vice President Joe Biden who is now with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

A 2009 Georgetown University paper put the cost of such an expansion at $12.1 billion.

Another of Obama's priorities is an expansion of early childhood education. Advocates say Obama's "universal pre-kindergarten" idea would better prepare children for school and help workers by making childcare more widely available.

Obama proposed spending $75 billion over 10 years and $1.3 billion in the first year on the early education program in his 2014 budget. He would have had smokers pay for it by increasing cigarette taxes to $1.95 per pack from $1.01 and indexing the tax to inflation.

While that issue gained little traction, Obama is betting a fall deadline will force action on another one of his proposals: $302 billion for transportation projects, an idea he hopes will attract some Republican support.

Legislation authorizing federal highway, rail and transit spending lapses September 30. While both the AFL-CIO, the nation's largest labor union and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce back efforts to upgrade transportation, Democrats and Republicans disagree on how to pay for highway repair.

To pay for the spending, Obama is proposing a corporate tax-code overhaul that would lower tax rates for companies but also eliminate a range of tax breaks, yielding $150 billion to spend on transportation.

Representative Tom Cole said House Republicans were open to discussing infrastructure but whether they could come to an agreement would depend on how it is funded.

Republicans, who plan to issue their own budget proposal this year, have criticized Obama for resisting making cuts to Social Security and Medicare entitlement programs.

"If we actually got entitlement reform that saved money over the course of a decade, there's no reason some of that savings couldn't flow toward infrastructure, or back toward the military, and still move us down the road on long-term deficit reduction," said Cole, an Oklahoma Republican and close ally of House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner.

The Congressional Budget Office has projected the budget deficit will total $514 billion in fiscal year 2014, or 3 percent of gross domestic product. That would be a decrease from $680 billion, or 4.1 percent of GDP, in the fiscal year 2013 that ended September 30.

However, CBO said that without action to rein in spending on entitlement programs, the deficit would start rising again starting in 2016 as more of the U.S. population retires to reach $1.03 trillion in 2022, or 4.1 percent of GDP.

(Reporting by Mark Felsenthal and David Lawder; Editing by Caren Bohan and Andrea Ricci)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (34)
RightIsMight wrote:
“The budget will flesh out a proposal Obama made in his State of the Union address to expand a tax break for the working poor known as the Earned Income Tax Credit. The president wants to increase the size of the credit for workers without children.”

I don’t know if you can logically call a redistribution of wealth a ‘tax break’.. According to the CBO, last year the top 40% paid 106.2% of income taxes & the bottom 40% paid -9.1% & got an average of $18,950 in ‘transfers’ (aka. money redistributed back to them).

America needs to look to entitlements to curb it’s out of control spending. Those people getting government handouts today will not be getting anything tomorrow if the fed continues it’s out of control spending spree.

Mar 02, 2014 1:50am EST  --  Report as abuse
breezinthru wrote:
If we borrow the money, then it comes from where the money isn’t. That won’t accomplish the intended goal because it must be repaid by people who have little means to repay it.

The money must be reallocated, not borrowed, thus it must come from where the money is.

I am opposed to just taxing wealthy corporations and wealthy people (corporations are not people), then shifting the money to the working poor through tax credits.

Instead the wealth tax should reallocated to those who had decent jobs before 2008 and to the young people who have been attempting to enter the work force, by making sure there is plenty of decent work available to them. There are some actions that are in America’s interest.

Revamp America’s power infrastructure and build the best information infrastructure in the world. Rebuild America’s transportation infrastructure. Rebuild the locks and dams to make them more efficient.

But don’t borrow the money to do these things. Either use a wealth tax to pay for these useful things or watch the rest of the world pass us by as we drift into the dustbin of history.

By definition, the money can’t come from people who have no jobs or from the working poor. It must come from where the money actually is.

Mar 02, 2014 5:55am EST  --  Report as abuse
chopper1 wrote:
Obama is broke he just doesn’t realize it!

Mar 02, 2014 7:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.