Majority of U.S. justices sympathize with inmate in death row case

WASHINGTON Mon Mar 3, 2014 12:17pm EST

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A majority of the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday appeared poised to rule for a Florida inmate who is challenging the state's method of deciding whether criminals are mentally disabled and therefore exempt from the death penalty.

The state determined that convicted murderer Freddie Lee Hall was mentally disabled in 1992, but later found him competent after he scored 71 on an IQ test, the minimum under Florida law.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, the regular swing vote on the nine-member Supreme Court, signaled during Monday's one-hour oral argument that he was likely to side with liberal justices in ruling for Hall. The court looks set to find that Florida's process for finding that Hall could be executed is not lawful under the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which bans cruel and unusual punishment.

At issue in the case is whether states should defer to the clinical consensus for determining whether people are mentally disabled. Hall's lawyers said experts, including the American Psychiatric Association, stated that IQ tests should include a standard error of measurement of five percentage points. Florida's test has a hard cut-off at 70 on the IQ test and does not take into account the standard error of measurement.

The high court's ruling could affect a handful of other states that have a similar approach.

Kennedy appeared especially concerned that in Florida, if an inmate scores above 70, there is no further attempt to determine mental disability with other tests.

"Your rule prevents us from getting a better understanding of whether the IQ score is accurate or not," Kennedy told Florida Solicitor General Allen Winsor.

Kennedy was in the majority in a 2002 case, Atkins v. Virginia, in which the court held that states could not execute someone who was mentally disabled.

Kennedy's questions on Monday were similar to those posed by the liberal members of the court, while the conservative wing, including Justice Antonin Scalia, appeared more sympathetic to Florida.

Hall, 68, was convicted of the 1978 shooting deaths of a sheriff's deputy and a woman who was seven months pregnant. Only his death sentence is at issue in the case.

A ruling is expected by the end of June. The case is Hall v. Florida, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 12-10882.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Additional reporting by David Ingram; Editing by Howard Goller and Lisa Von Ahn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (7)
Riversong wrote:
Given that Floridians seem to have an IQ distribution significantly lower than that of the rest of America, it would seem that they should proportionately lower the bar on mental incapacity to something on the order of IQ50, otherwise almost anyone can Stand Their Ground and claim stupidity.

Mar 03, 2014 1:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
dualcitizen wrote:
I knew it was wrong (He was sentenced to death for murdering Karol Hurst, a 21-year-old pregnant woman who was abducted leaving a Florida grocery store in 1978.Hall also has been convicted of killing a sheriff’s deputy and has been imprisoned for the past 35 years. He earlier served a prison term for assault with intent to commit rape and was out on parole when he killed Hurst.)
but I’m nuts, shouldn’t count. Yeah suuuuure. More lib excuses.

Mar 03, 2014 1:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
zigo wrote:
What do some social conservatives like about death?

Mar 03, 2014 2:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.