Los Angeles City Council approves e-cigarette ban

LOS ANGELES Tue Mar 4, 2014 4:42pm EST

An e-cigarette sits in a tray on the bar at the Henley Vaporium in New York City December 18, 2013. REUTERS/Mike Segar

An e-cigarette sits in a tray on the bar at the Henley Vaporium in New York City December 18, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

Related Topics

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - The Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously on Tuesday to ban the use of electronic cigarettes, popularly known as "vaping," from restaurants, bars, nightclubs and other public spaces within the nation's second-largest city.

If signed into law by Mayor Eric Garcetti, the measure would take effect in 30 days, said Tony Arranaga, spokesman for Councilman Mitch O'Farrell, one of the sponsors of the bill.

Los Angeles would join a growing list of cities, including New York and Chicago, that restrict the use of e-cigarettes, battery-powered cartridges filled with nicotine liquid that create an inhalable vapor when heated.

At stake is the future of an industry that some analysts believe will eventually overtake the $80 billion-a-year tobacco business.

Advocates of e-cigarettes say they are less dangerous than tobacco products and can help smokers quit.

But public health experts fear they may act as a gateway to smoking for the uninitiated. Critics also point to potential harm posed to individuals who may inhale second-hand vapor from e-cigarettes, saying too little is known about the effects of the chemicals contained in the cartridges.

Under the measure passed by the City Council, e-cigarette use would be prohibited from bars, nightclubs, restaurants and outdoor areas where tobacco smoking is generally restricted, such as parks, beaches, farmers markets, recreational areas and outdoor dining spaces.

The bill provides exemptions to allow e-cigarettes in vaping lounges and stores, similar to exceptions made for cigar and hookah lounges under traditional anti-smoking restrictions. E-cigarettes would also be permitted for theatrical purposes.

(Reporting by Steve Gorman; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Meredith Mazzilli)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (17)
EphraimF wrote:
What’s next, banning breathing?

When we were younger, they never had any of these stupid rules, and people of our generation are living longer than ever in history.

If what other people bothers you, then stay home.

Mar 04, 2014 4:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Seamusknows wrote:
TIt’s not Smoking. What a vapid group of intellectual lightweights.

Mar 04, 2014 5:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
EphraimF wrote:
Why does Reuters have a comment box, but does not post people’s comment? Pretty strange.

Mar 04, 2014 5:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

A tourist takes a plunge as she swims at Ngapali Beach, a popular tourist site, in the Thandwe township of the Rakhine state, October 6, 2013. Picture taken October 6, 2013. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun (MYANMAR - Tags: SOCIETY) - RTR3FOI0

Where do you want to go?

We look at when to take trips, budget considerations and the popularity of multigenerational family travel.   Video