CERAWEEK-Bakken producer: U.S. oil export ban could squeeze production

HOUSTON, March 4 Tue Mar 4, 2014 8:08pm EST

Related Topics

HOUSTON, March 4 (Reuters) - If the United States does not lift a decades-old crude export ban, oil producers could slowly cut back on output, the chief operating officer of Continental Resources Inc said on Tuesday.

The impact of production growth with only very limited access to global markets under the ban will keep crude prices depressed. Cutbacks in output would gradually emerge, said Rick Bott, president of Continental. The oil and gas producer is a major player in North Dakota's Bakken shale fields.

"It may be death by a thousand cuts," he said during a panel discussion of oil logistics at the annual IHS CERAWeek energy conference in Houston.

He said producers are already seeing impacts of what he called steep backwardation in the U.S. oil market, where current prices are higher than those in the future.

"We're already having an impact on upstream I believe. It certainly will next year and it will the year after," Bott said.

Discussion of possibly lifting the crude export ban, which was imposed in the 1970s in response to the Arab oil embargo, has largely dominated the conference, an annual gathering of top executives from energy companies throughout the world.

The U.S. shale oil revolution has fueled such talk, as U.S. output is soaring, so much that many refiners no longer import light sweet crude to their U.S. Gulf Coast plants.

Some experts say the boom will not last, as shale wells have high decline rates shortly after production starts. However, Bott challenged that view, saying that while initial decline rates may be steep, production will continue at lower levels for a long time.

"It has a really long tail," he said. "It's that tail you're counting on."

While producers such as Continental could benefit from higher crude prices if U.S. oil were exported into the global market, refiners could pay higher prices for crude they process, cutting into profits.

The chief executive officer of a 330,000 barrel-per-day refinery in Pennsylvania that buys one-fourth of all Bakken crude production said any decision needs much study.

"That crude, elsewhere in the world, is more valuable and they want to take the crude up to that value," said Philip Rinaldi of Philadelphia Energy Solutions. "The biggest mistake we could make right now is to go and do an immediate lifting of that ban."

Rinaldi said Bakken producers have declined to sign long-term contracts with his refinery, saying they would prefer to sell on the spot market so they can capture price increases.

That demonstrates that the U.S. crude market is not yet saturated, he said.

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Oldfarmermac wrote:
Rick Bott is pulling every body’s tail when he talks about the long tail of shale oil wells. After five or six years it take a hundred of these wells to produce as much as just one really good conventional well.

The Bakken is the poster child of the tight oil industry and the state of North Dakota publishes the data on each ands every well.

THe decline rate is so steep it is truly scary.

It currently takes the production of three out of every four new Bakken wells just to hold production steady from one month the the next.

Uncle Sam publishes the data too.

Mar 05, 2014 5:41pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.