Alabama lawmakers weigh strict 'fetal heartbeat' abortion ban

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama Tue Mar 4, 2014 9:23pm EST

Related Topics

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama (Reuters) - Alabama lawmakers on Tuesday approved a bill that would ban abortions after a fetal heartbeat is heard, which will almost guarantee a legal challenge from opponents.

The measure passed by a vote of 73-29, according to State Rep. Paul Lee, a Republican, who spoke to Reuters from the House floor. The bill, along with three other abortion restriction bills, now goes to the Senate.

No other state has such a law in effect. Efforts by legislators in North Dakota and Arkansas to prohibit abortions after the detection of a heartbeat have been blocked by courts while lawsuits are pending.

The sponsor of the Alabama measure, Republican state Representative Mary Sue McClurkin, said it was needed to protect the lives of unborn children.

"If your heart is beating, that means you are alive," she said during a recent committee hearing.

Critics of the legislation say a fetal heartbeat can be detected as early as five or six weeks into a pregnancy, which is before many women even realize they are pregnant.

The proposed abortion restriction is "blatantly" unconstitutional, said Jennifer Dalven, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Reproductive Freedom Project.

"It would be the most extreme law by far in the country," Dalven said in an interview.

Alabama lawmakers on Tuesday also voted to lengthen the current waiting period before an abortion can be performed to 48 hours from 24 hours.

The House also passed a bill that calls for at least a 48-hour wait for a woman who learns her fetus has a lethal condition and will not survive outside of the womb. Under the proposal, she would be required to learn about perinatal hospice options.

She would have to sign a waiver testifying that she opted for the abortion over hospice care.

"This is a cruel bill," said Nikema Williams, vice president of public policy for Planned Parenthood Southeast. She said there are no such perinatal hospice services in Alabama.

The fourth measure would add new requirements for pregnant minors seeking an abortion. In instances where a young woman seeks permission from a judge instead of a parent, the bill would allow parents to participate in the proceedings, even in cases where there may have been parental abuse, Dalven said.

The proposals follow a law passed in Alabama last year that requires abortion clinics to meet surgical center standards by March 24, a move that critics say threatens to shutter three of Alabama's five remaining abortion clinics.

(Reporting by Verna Gates and Melinda Dickinson; Additional reporting and writing by Colleen Jenkins; Editing by Tom Brown, Mary Wisniewski and Ken Wills)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Bakhtin wrote:
This is a decision that should be made by the woman and her doctor. Not something forced onto her by interfering big-government Republicans. It is a personal choice and the state should have no place in it.

Mar 05, 2014 1:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
AmeliaHR wrote:
This may be a step in the right direction. I hope that other states will follow. I’ve had an abortion and I really wish that I had not. Also, along with this ban, I really hope that young women have access to counseling and education that will deter them from getting pregnant when they’re not yet ready to be a mother. I definitely agree with this ban. Abortion is wrong. Maybe more should be done to teach woman about the importance of preventing an unwanted pregnancy.

Mar 05, 2014 2:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
dexter2001 wrote:
Choosing to have sex, like choosing to speed in your car IS your choice. We all know the potential consequences for each action may be you get pregnant or get a speeding ticket respectively. I choose to not want a speeding ticket, so can I just abort/murder the cop to make the ticket go away? A silly argument right…..just like, I will kill an innocent unborn baby because I don’t want to be pregnant. If you don’t want a ticket….don’t speed, but if you do speed know the consequences.

How sick in the head does a person have to be to murder their own son or daughter when there is a 10 year waiting list to adopt a healthy white baby.

Mar 08, 2014 8:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.