Exclusive: Syria to miss deadline to destroy 12 chemical arms sites-sources at OPCW

THE HAGUE Thu Mar 6, 2014 4:05pm EST

THE HAGUE (Reuters) - Syria will miss a major deadline next week in the program to destroy its chemical weapons production facilities, sources at the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said on Thursday.

Syria declared 12 production facilities to the OPCW and has until March 15 to destroy them under a deal agreed with the United States and Russia. Damascus has already missed several deadlines laid out in the agreement.

"That will definitely be missed," said an official involved in discussions with Syria, referring to the March 15 deadline.

The official, who asked not to be identified, said there were seven "hardened" aircraft hangars and five underground facilities. "None of them have been destroyed at the moment," the official said.

Syrian officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

Damascus agreed last year to destroy all chemical weapons facilities and surrender 1,300 metric tons of toxic agents to a joint OPCW/United Nations mission. It has until June 30 to eliminate its chemical weapons program completely.

The deal averted U.S. missile strikes threatened by Washington after an August 21 sarin gas attack killed hundreds of people in the outskirts of the capital.

Syria missed a February 5 deadline to ship all chemicals abroad for destruction and is weeks behind schedule. It has increased the handover of poisonous agents, including a shipment of mustard gas this week, but will not meet a March 30 deadline to neutralize all the chemicals overseas, sources at OPCW said.

That process was already supposed to have started on board the U.S. MV Cape Ray, a cargo ship outfitted with special chemical neutralization equipment. But only a quarter of the so-called priority 1 chemicals, the most dangerous ingredients for chemical weapons, have been relinquished, officials said.


Syria is not taking the deadline for the destruction of production facilities seriously, another source at the OPCW said on Thursday.

"They are not doing things in the timeframe they promised they would," the source said. "The process is in volatile waters."

The latest comments in The Hague, where members of the OPCW are meeting until Friday, came after sharp criticism of the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Wednesday by the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Powers.

A Syrian request to convert for peaceful use some of the facilities declared under its weapons program has already been rejected, because Western governments fear they could easily be re-converted for military use.

Damascus proposed "sealing" the sites with cement, the sources said, but that idea was dismissed by several Western diplomats at an OPCW executive council meeting this week.

"Destroyed means destroyed," the second source said. "Why should a country that used chemical weapons against its own people be given special privileges?"

Syria has missed almost every deadline of the agreement reached last year, which is being jointly overseen by the Nobel Peace Prize-winning OPCW and the United Nations. The OPCW said Syria will have shipped out roughly one third of its chemical weapons by the end of this week.

"You can say they have upped the momentum and shipped out nearly a third, or you can say they haven't given up two-thirds of the stuff they should already have sent out of the country," one OPCW source said.

Missing the June 30 deadline would have serious political implications, with Washington and Moscow having both invested diplomatic credibility in the chemical weapons elimination process, brokered by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov.

The international community is footing the bill for the complex operation involving ships from the United States, Norway and Denmark, Chinese and Russian security, an Italian port and commercial destruction facilities in Britain and Germany.

(Reporting by Anthony Deutsch; Editing by Alistair Lyon)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
_Ethan_ wrote:
We can ask ISRAEL to bomb it for us, from the air.

That would be much easier, quicker and also cheaper than trying to destroy all these places from the ground.

Israel has a strong airforce, they can do it!

Mar 06, 2014 6:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
TruWorldPeace wrote:
“Why should a country that used chemical weapons against its own people be given special privileges?”

For the record: it has not been proved by any respectable independent body that the Syrian government used chemical weapons. Majority of people around the world today (including myself) believe that it was the Western-sponsored Al Qaeda terrorists who used chemical weapons. To this date, no one has answered the fundamental question: Why would the Syrian government invite UN inspectors and deploy chemical weapons on the first day of the inspection?

We all know that the Syrian government is not made of fools. In fact, it has proven to be a very clever government, managing to outmaneuver a huge conspiracy hatched by the West and implemented by their Arab puppets.

Mar 07, 2014 2:32am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.