As Ukraine crisis deepens, Russia's neighbors boost defenses

VILNIUS/WARSAW Fri Mar 7, 2014 6:56am EST

Related Topics

VILNIUS/WARSAW (Reuters) - U.S. fighter jets go to Lithuania as the crisis in Ukraine deepens. Poland talks about modernizing its military. Latvia calls for more defense spending. Traditionally neutral Sweden calls for a "doctrinal shift" in defense.

After a sense of playing second fiddle for years while NATO's eyes were on wars such as Afghanistan, some European countries near Russia's borders are now planning to spend more money on defense as well as hoping for more NATO resources .

Many government officials in the region have felt for years that their warnings of Russian assertiveness have fallen on deaf ears in Washington and with NATO. Suddenly, as Russia seizes control of Ukraine's Crimea region, they are relishing new-found attention - and with it plans to expand defenses from fighter jets to missile systems.

Some plans may be small in European terms - Lithuania's total defense budget, for example, is around 280 million euros ($390 million). But, often accompanied by anti-Russian rhetoric, the moves reflect how the region's security is now back on the agenda.

"After the events in Ukraine, the Russian aggression, the need to increase spending will be better understood by Lithuanian people, and there will be more support for it," Lithuania Defence Minister Juozas Olekas told Reuters.

President Vladimir Putin's justification for intervening in Ukraine to protect Russian speakers there has alarmed many in the Baltics, which have their own ethnic Russian minorities whose rights Moscow says are being undermined.

The Baltics and Poland were all part of the Soviet bloc until just over two decades ago. They have long harbored deep suspicions about Moscow's intentions in the region as they increasingly turn to the West. All are now members of the European Union and the NATO military alliance.

"There has been a concern that U.S. and NATO are focusing on other parts in the world, such as Afghanistan or China, and not giving enough attention to Eastern Europe," said Allan Sikk, a senior lecturer at the School of Slavonic and Eastern European Studies at University College London.

After Russia's military intervention in Georgia in 2008, NATO was reported to have organized a Baltic defence contingency plan - something new for the region, but on which the alliance declines to comment.

"My guess is that there is a longer term change now in the cards, and it will be a major change," said Sikk.

LONG CRITICAL OF RUSSIA

There is an element of "I told you so" in the Baltics, a region that has long been one of the most vocal against Russia.

Even before the Ukraine crisis, the region was worried about Moscow. NATO scrambled jets more than 40 times to check on Russian jets approaching Baltic borders last year. That compares to once in 2004 when NATO first began patrolling here.

The Pentagon is now ramping up the number of U.S. fighter jets on a NATO air patrol mission in the Baltics and do more training with Poland's air force.

"Russia is a threat to the whole of Europe. And Europe must finally understand what it is dealing with," Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite said in Brussels on Thursday.

Only a few years ago Grybauskaite called for a defence spending freeze. Now she has become more hawkish.

"Life always gives many corrections, including to political decisions," Grybauskaite said. "Regional security is very important. Certain changes (to defence spending) are likely."

In the last few years Polish officials have questioned, in private, whether the Obama administration is fully focused on the security of NATO members in Eastern Europe. Many felt let down after Obama scaled back a planned missile defence shield.

Even before the Ukraine crisis broke, Poland planned to spend some $45 billion in the next decade to build a new missile defence system and upgrade its weapons systems, including transport helicopters and tanks.

After Russia's build up in Crimea, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk was even more bullish. "The conflict," he said "should accelerate the modernization of the Polish army."

The U.S. military will send 12 F-16 fighter jets and 300 service personnel to Poland next week for a training exercise that has been expanded since the Ukraine crisis.

In Sweden, which has strong ties to the Baltics, Finance Minister Anders Borg said Russia was "a bit more erratic and unpredictable" and called for more defence spending.

His statement came a day after Sweden moved two fighter jets to Gotland, a Baltic island almost demilitarized in recent years due to spending cuts. Deputy Prime Minister Jan Bjorklund called this week for a "doctrinal shift" in Swedish defence policy. There has been talk of Sweden fully joining NATO.

Still there are limits and talk of increased defence may fade if they is a quick resolution to the crisis.

Lithuania only spends about 0.8 percent of its GDP on defence. Its abilities to increase defence spending are restricted by its plans to adopt the euro, above all the need to keep the budget deficit under control.

"The only change will probably be more praise for the army, but not more money," said Kestutis Girnius, an associate professor at Vilnius Institute of International Relations and Political Science.

($1 = 0.7225 euros)

(Additional reporting by David Mardiste in Tallinn; Nerijus Adomaitis in Oslo; johan Ahlander in Stockholn and Aija Krutaine in Riga; Writing by Alistair Scrutton; Editing by Giles Elgood)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
SR37212 wrote:
This is really Europe’s problem. I see no reason why the US should ramp up forces in Europe while those countries are claiming they have to rein in their respective budgets. Let them match the amount of GDP we spend on defense, then we can talk about adding forces.

Mar 07, 2014 4:25pm EST  --  Report as abuse
westernshame wrote:
and the military industrial complex jumps with joy. the threat of war isn’t quite as profitable as an actual war but beggars can’t be choosers….

Mar 07, 2014 4:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
lkofenglish wrote:
i see no reason why the “USA should ramp up forces” either…mark my words “we will.”
“The trap was set…the bear took it. The plans now cease to exist.”

Here come the international observers, the “crisis intervention teams”…I mean this is…having the UN Guy holed in a cafe? REALLY?….this thing is Checkov…and just as real.

The Ukrainian Commander of his Ship refusing to surrender? While having machine guns leveled at him and prayers for his sailors who will go down with him? The only thing missing was “dramatic Ukrainian Music in Background.”

What do a people need to do to earn their freedom? This country feeds the world. They are not poor that’s fer sure.

I would agree they are quite underpaid. And apparently if you’re in the military over there there are a few issues with protocol.

I would let the ships go if I were President Putin

Mar 07, 2014 6:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus