Media executives question Comcast-Time Warner Cable deal

Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:17pm EDT

A man walks past the Time Warner Cable headquarters in New York February 13, 2014. REUTERS/Joshua Lott

A man walks past the Time Warner Cable headquarters in New York February 13, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Lott

Related Topics

(Reuters) - One of the top executives of Twenty-First Century Fox Inc has raised questions about Comcast's potential dominance of the U.S. broadband Internet market if regulators allow its $45.2 billion merger with Time Warner Cable to be completed.

Speaking at an investor conference on Tuesday, Chase Carey, Fox president and chief operating officer, said the "broadband issue" will be front and center when U.S. regulators review the tie-up that merges the No. 1 and No. 2 cable operators.

Asked about concerns over the merger, Carey said, "Probably the issue that will come out of it, and that will ultimately get focused on, is really the broadband issue. Is there choice in broadband? Are you really headed toward every home having simply one broadband provider, and what are the implications of that?"

If its bid for Time Warner Cable is approved, Comcast would be the Internet provider to about 40 percent of U.S. households paying for high-speed Internet access, analysts estimate.

As TV service becomes more personalized with new navigation tools and targeted advertising, broadband infrastructure, and who controls that service, will become even more critical, Carey said. There has not been any pushback so far from companies against the deal, he added.

"We haven't seen any filings yet and how does that get addressed? I assume there will be aspects of that that are addressed," he said.

"Potentially, you may have for most of the country, simply one wired broadband pipe and again that's the piece that will get, at the end of the day, most focused on," he said.

Comcast did not respond to a request for comment.

Also at the same conference, Time Warner Inc Chief Executive Jeff Bewkes predicted a government role in bolstering post-merger competition.

"In the longer run there are some questions on competition that any deal like this will look at, the government will look at and make sure the appropriate conditions are in place to optimize competition," Bewkes said.

DirecTV's CEO Mike White, who was already called for regulatory scrutiny of the deal, said on Tuesday, that the government will likely focus on "all the aspects of Internet, from net neutrality to you name it."

He also said the government should consider whether Comcast is a national business instead of a local one which "requires the government to take a different perspective."

Once Comcast files its merger documents with regulators, the Justice Department and the U.S. Federal Communications Commission will both take months to review the merger's impact on competition, focusing on antitrust and public interest concerns respectively.

(Reporting by Liana B. Baker; Editing by Nick Zieminski and Cynthia Osterman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
tatman wrote:
i am one person who is deeply concerned about this broadband merger, as i subscribe to time warner’s business class broadband service (which has been exceptional, in both uptime and service). having been a very dissatisfied comcast customer in the past, the idea that i will be forced back into such a horrible situation again with a company that provided some of the absolute WORST customer service i’ve encountered thus far in my professional career makes me very uneasy…

Mar 11, 2014 12:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
dd606 wrote:
I would love to see a return to on-air TV. The demand is there. On air stations have quadrupled in my area. TV should have never been provided through cable or DBS in the first place. It’s a completely idiotic system. The only reason why it happened, is because the main networks thought they could fend off the new networks, like Showtime. Obviously they failed. What they should have done is partnered with them, and charged them to use their own on-air infrastructure. But now we are stuck with this antiquated system, which takes billions to maintain. There is a huge conflict of interest between entertainment providers and content creators, because it’s the same handful of companies that own it all.

Mar 11, 2014 1:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.