Sandusky's wife claims he's innocent, victims manipulated

Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:44am EDT

Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky (L) and his wife Dottie arrive for a preliminary hearing to determine if there is enough evidence to hold him for trial on charges of sexually abusing boys, at the Centre County Courthouse in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, December 13, 2011. SREUTERS/Pat Little

Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky (L) and his wife Dottie arrive for a preliminary hearing to determine if there is enough evidence to hold him for trial on charges of sexually abusing boys, at the Centre County Courthouse in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, December 13, 2011. S

Credit: Reuters/Pat Little

Related Topics

(Reuters) - The wife of convicted child molester and former Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky said on Wednesday that he was innocent and that victims who testified against him were manipulated for money.

In her first television interview on the subject, Dottie Sandusky said on NBC's "Today" show that she believed her husband's contention that he had never molested boys, including incidents in their home in State College, Pennsylvania.

Jerry Sandusky, 70, a former defensive coordinator at Pennsylvania State University, was convicted of 45 counts of child sex abuse. He was sentenced to 30 to 60 years in prison for abusing 10 boys over 15 years, including on campus.

"I think they were manipulated. Once lawyers came into the case, they said there was money," she said of the victims who testified in the 2012 trial.

Asked about newspaper commentators' contention that she was complicit in the abuse, Sandusky said, "I'm not a weak spouse."

"As you know, they called me 'Sarge' because Jerry said I kept everybody in line. If they want to say that, let them say that."

Penn State said in October it had paid $60 million to 26 men to settle the bulk of claims against it stemming from the scandal. They included one from the Sanduskys' adopted son Matt.

Sandusky told "Today" she believed her husband's contention that he was innocent.

"I definitely believe him because if I didn't believe him ... when I testified at trial I could not have said what I said. I would have had to tell the truth," she said.

Sandusky was joined in the interview by documentary filmmaker John Ziegler, who believes Jerry Sandusky is innocent and has interviewed him in prison.

The former coach's $4,900-a-month pension was revoked when he was sentenced. The decision also ended benefits for his wife, and Jerry Sandusky is trying to have the pension restored.

The case shattered Penn State's storied football program and focused national attention on child sexual abuse.

(Editing by Bernadette Baum)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
hawkeye19 wrote:
Run out your time, lady. Finish off your life. You allowed those boys to be raped in your basement. According to the evidence, you should be in prison too as an accessory. Just be glad you’re free and have some money to lie on. Run out the clock, Mrs. Sandusky.

Mar 12, 2014 11:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
lilliebear wrote:
I do not feel sorry for this man. These men have to live with this for the rest of their lives. I cannot even imagine what they are going through. He also killed Joe Paterno not literally of course…. I hope that he gets what is coming to him..

Mar 12, 2014 11:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
yrconscience wrote:
Although it is somewhat understandable that Dottie Sanduskey continue to argue her husband’s innocence, because her complicity in his crime is implied, it is difficult to view her as other than in a complete state of denial, making baseless accusations against her husband’s victims. It is in a word pathetic. She would be better served remaining silent unless she can provide some actual proof, other than her family nickname.

Mar 12, 2014 11:05am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.