Tennessee must recognize marriages of 3 same-sex couples -judge

NASHVILLE, Tennessee Sat Mar 15, 2014 12:49am EDT

NASHVILLE, Tennessee (Reuters) - Tennessee must recognize the legal same-sex marriages of three couples who wed in other states, a federal judge in Nashville ruled on Friday in a limited decision that echoed a similar case in neighboring Kentucky.

Judge Aleta Trauger granted the couples a preliminary injunction that requires Tennessee to recognize their marriages pending a final decision on the constitutionality of Tennessee's ban on same-sex nuptials.

"At this point, all signs indicate that, in the eyes of the United States Constitution, the plaintiffs' marriages will be placed on an equal footing with those of heterosexual couples and that proscriptions against same-sex marriage will soon become a footnote in the annals of American history," Trauger wrote in the decision.

The ruling comes as gay rights advocates gain momentum in their fight to legalize same-sex marriage. Federal judges have recently struck down gay marriage bans in several states, including Utah, Virginia and Texas. Such rulings have been put on hold pending appeals.

"This is the first nail in the coffin of marriage discrimination in Tennessee, and we won't stop until we have full marriage equality here. It will happen," said Abby Rubenfeld, the lead attorney in the case.

The trend follows a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June that legally married same-sex couples nationwide are eligible for federal benefits. The decision struck down a key part of the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act.

The office of Republican Governor Bill Haslam said state officials were reviewing the opinion.

"The governor is disappointed that the court has stepped in when Tennesseans have voted clearly on this issue. It's inappropriate to comment further due to the continuing litigation," said David Smith, spokesman for the governor.

Family Action Council of Tennessee President David Fowler said he expects Cooper will pursue an appeal if Trauger ultimately strikes down the state's marriage law.

Trauger "clearly signaled her intent to continue the war by unelected federal judges against the rights of states and the citizens of that to determine what its policies regarding marriage should be," Fowler said in a statement.

The couples in Friday's ruling, who were married in New York and California before moving to Tennessee, did not challenge the constitutionality of Tennessee's ban on same-sex marriage.

In February, a federal judge ordered Kentucky to recognize the legal same-sex marriages of residents who wed outside the state. Kentucky's governor plans to hire outside counsel to handle an appeal of that decision.

Same-sex couples can legally wed in 17 states plus the District of Columbia.

(Additional reporting by David Bailey in Minneapolis and Brendan O'Brien in Milwaukee; Editing by Cynthia Johnston, Lisa Shumaker, Richard Chang and Ken Wills)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
Laborman wrote:
When will states stop wasting taxpayer money on this futile attempt at bigotry? It no longer matters whether you are for or against marriage equality any more than it matters whether or not you are for or against segregation or lynching. The legal handwriting is on the wall. Get over it and move on to harassing some other group. Why are conservatives so gung ho about tax money and the constitution when it comes to one-half of one sentence of one amendment about their guns, but freely waste law enforcement and court time and money and don’t want to hear about constitutional rights when it comes to other matters such as gay marriage? Hypocrites through and through. That’s why. But the game is up. It SHOWS.

Mar 14, 2014 10:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Laborman wrote:
When will states stop wasting taxpayer money on this futile attempt at bigotry? It no longer matters whether you are for or against marriage equality any more than it matters whether or not you are for or against segregation or lynching. The legal handwriting is on the wall. Get over it and move on to harassing some other group. Why are conservatives so gung ho about tax money and the constitution when it comes to one-half of one sentence of one amendment about their guns, but freely waste law enforcement and court time and money and don’t want to hear about constitutional rights when it comes to other matters such as gay marriage? Hypocrites through and through. That’s why. But the game is up. It SHOWS.

Mar 14, 2014 10:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Laborman wrote:
When will states stop wasting taxpayer money on this futile attempt at bigotry? It no longer matters whether you are for or against marriage equality any more than it matters whether or not you are for or against segregation or lynching. The legal handwriting is on the wall. Get over it and move on to harassing some other group. Why are conservatives so gung ho about tax money and the constitution when it comes to one-half of one sentence of one amendment about their guns, but freely waste law enforcement and court time and money and don’t want to hear about constitutional rights when it comes to other matters such as gay marriage? Hypocrites through and through. That’s why. But the game is up. It SHOWS.

Mar 14, 2014 10:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.