U.S. Senate leader orders probe of alleged CIA computer hacking

WASHINGTON Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:30pm EDT

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) answers questions from reporters after the weekly Republican caucus luncheon at the U.S. Capitol in Washington March 11, 2014. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) answers questions from reporters after the weekly Republican caucus luncheon at the U.S. Capitol in Washington March 11, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The leader of the U.S. Senate strongly backed the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday in a dispute with the Central Intelligence Agency, ordering an investigation into what he called an "indefensible" breach of the panel's computers by the CIA.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said accusations that the agency spied on the panel's computers as it investigated the use of harsh interrogation techniques during the Bush administration raised concerns about possible violations of the Constitution.

"The CIA has not only interfered with the lawful congressional oversight of its activities, but has also seemingly attempted to intimidate its overseers by subjecting them to criminal investigation," Reid said in a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder obtained by Reuters.

"These developments strike at the heart of the constitutional separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches," Reid, a Nevada Democrat, added.

Senator Dianne Feinstein, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused the agency last week of searching computers used by committee staffers compiling a report on the CIA's use of harsh interrogation methods such as simulated drowning, or waterboarding, in the wake of the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

Questioning whether the agency broke the law, the veteran California Democrat also denied wrongdoing by members of her staff in a strongly worded speech on the Senate floor that brought to light the simmering dispute between Democratic committee members and President Barack Obama's CIA chief.

It was a striking departure for Feinstein, one of the U.S. lawmakers most supportive of the national security community, notably since former contractor Edward Snowden began releasing secret information about U.S. surveillance programs.

Republican committee members have mostly stayed out of the fray, as has Obama. The president said it would be inappropriate to weigh in on an ongoing investigation.

The CIA accused committee staff members of illegally obtaining information, and sent a "crimes report" to the Justice Department about committee staff members' activities in obtaining classified information.

'PATENTLY ABSURD'

The Intelligence Committee is responsible for oversight of the CIA. Its 6,000-page draft report on the interrogation program was finished over a year ago but is still classified. Sources say it strongly condemns the now-abandoned harsh interrogation techniques and concludes they did not produce significant counter-terrorism breakthroughs.

Reid said he would have the Sergeant at Arms, the Senate's chief security officer, begin a forensic examination of computers assigned for exclusive use by Senate Intelligence staff.

"The CIA's decision to access the resources and work product of the legislative branch without permission is absolutely indefensible, regardless of the context," Reid wrote.

He said the agency's actions cause him "great concern" as leader of the U.S. Senate.

Reid also wrote to John Brennan, the director of the CIA, asking for cooperation with the investigation of what Reid said would mark the third time since 2010 in which the agency acknowledged intruding into Intelligence Committee computer networks.

Both letters were dated March 19.

"To my knowledge, the CIA has produced no evidence to support its claims that Senate committee staff who have no technical training somehow hacked into the CIA's highly secure classified networks, an allegation that appears on its face to be patently absurd," Reid wrote to Brennan.

The CIA responded that Brennan is committed to resolving every outstanding issue related to the Intelligence Committee's report and strengthening its relationship with Congress.

"We are a far better organization because of congressional oversight, and we will do whatever we can to be responsive to the elected representatives of the American people," CIA spokesman Dean Boyd said.

The Justice Department had no immediate response to Reid. "We are reviewing the letter," department spokesman Brian Fallon said in an email.

Attorney General Holder told a news conference on Wednesday that Justice was reviewing the referrals from the CIA on the Intelligence Committee's interrogation review. He said receiving a referral does not mean the department would investigate.

(Additional reporting by David Ingram; Editing by Doina Chiacu, Stephen Powell and Tom Brown)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
gkam wrote:
These agencies work FOR us, not ON us. They exist for OUR benefit, we do not exist for theirs.

End them!!

Mar 20, 2014 10:18am EDT  --  Report as abuse
euro-yank wrote:
I confess to more than a smidgeon of ‘schadenfreude’ that the senator who had been so vigorously defending the American spies got caught in the web herself, I too believe that the US is wasting alot of time and money on these ‘spooks.’

They do more harm than good and I agree with gkam above, they need to be eliminated. (Just think how much better the tax dollars could be spent)

Mar 20, 2014 11:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
brotherkenny4 wrote:
Remember, we just came out of the terrorist fear period, when the nations people were perilously close to becoming another Nazi Germany. Indeed, we gave up freedom because of fear, just like Germany. The politicians such as Reid and Feinstein and most others were seriously worried that they may offend the brainwashed and fearful US citizens and risk losing their jobs. So, had they previously stood up against facism, they would have likely been voted out. So, they allowed the abuses, but remained presumably ignorant of details that would require them to take action against the abuses because these actions did not agree with their public campaign rhetoric. So, because they let it slide so long (during the entire Bush administration and the first term of Obama), the CIA felt it was in control. Which they probably were.

It’s also not clear if this current action is a true concern and response on the part of the senators, or a staged event to give the impression of oversight, to lessen the belief by some americans that the NSA and CIA are out of control. Which of course they are, but perhaps at the behest of congress, who apparently wants to remain ignorant of details.

We should get rid of them, but that will never happen until the people take control of the congress again, and that won’t happen until the people are no longer separated by false ideological leadership coming from national organizations tied to industry. In other words, when the american people are no longer brainwashed by the corporate media. Which is very unlikely to ever happen. It’s like trying to wake up a nation of cult members.

Mar 20, 2014 12:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.