U.N. rights investigator accuses Israel of 'ethnic cleansing'

GENEVA Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:22pm EDT

United Nations Special Rapporteur on occupied Palestine, Richard Falk addresses a news conference at the U.N. European headquarters in Geneva March 21, 2014. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse

United Nations Special Rapporteur on occupied Palestine, Richard Falk addresses a news conference at the U.N. European headquarters in Geneva March 21, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Denis Balibouse

GENEVA (Reuters) - A U.N. human rights investigator accused Israel on Friday of "ethnic cleansing" in pushing Palestinians out of East Jerusalem and cast doubt that the Israeli government could accept a Palestinian state in the current climate.

He spoke against a backdrop of deadlocked peace talks and accelerating Israeli settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem which Palestinians say is dimming their hope of establishing a viable state on contiguous territory.

Israel says Palestinian refusal to recognize it as a Jewish state is the main obstacle. U.S. President Barack Obama this week pressed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to help break the impasse, saying both sides must take political risks before the April 29 deadline for a framework deal.

Richard Falk, United Nations special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, told a news conference that Israeli policies bore "unacceptable characteristics of colonialism, apartheid and ethnic cleansing".

"Every increment of enlarging the settlements or every incident of house demolition is a way of worsening the situation confronting the Palestinian people and reducing what prospects they might have as the outcome of supposed peace negotiations."

Asked about his accusation of ethnic cleansing, Falk said that more than 11,000 Palestinians had lost their right to live in Jerusalem since 1996 due to Israel imposing residency laws favoring Jews and revoking Palestinian residence permits.

"The 11,000 is just the tip of the iceberg because many more are faced with possible challenges to their residency rights."

This compounded the "ordeal of this extended, prolonged occupation", according to Falk, an international law expert and professor emeritus at Princeton University in the United States.

Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem in the 1967 Middle East war and later annexed the latter, declaring it part of its eternal, indivisible capital, a move never recognized internationally.

Palestinians seek a state in the West Bank and Gaza with East Jerusalem as their capital. In 2005 Israel quit Gaza, now run by Hamas Islamists opposed to Abbas' peace efforts, but settlement growth continues in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Falk said that Israel had made a systematic effort to "change the ethnic composition" of East Jerusalem by making it more difficult for Palestinians to reside there while encouraging the spread of settlements, which are considered illegal under international law.

In a report last month, Falk said Israeli policies in the West Bank appeared to amount to "apartheid and segregation" with a de facto annexation of parts of the territory, denying the Palestinian right to self-determination.

There was no immediate Israeli response to his remarks on Friday. Israel has not responded officially to Falk's February report via the president of the U.N. Human Rights Council, the usual channel, U.N. officials in Geneva said.

In the past Israel has strongly denied accusations of persecuting Palestinians, accusing them of inciting anti-Israeli violence and being unwilling to make permanent peace with the Jewish state.


Direct peace negotiations usually coincide with intensified Israeli settlement activity, he told reporters.

The U.S.-brokered peace process seemed to be primarily a project of Secretary of State John Kerry who had received only "minimal support from Obama himself", Falk said.

"There are other reasons for encouraging the idea that it's still possible to negotiate a settlement based on the two-state model, even though most informed observers regard it as highly implausible given the changes that have taken place during the period of occupation and given the outlook of the Netanyahu government," he said, making clear he was among the skeptics.

Even entering negotiations, he said, is seen as a "betrayal" by Israeli political factions and parties that are to the right of the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

"A few years ago it would be hard to imagine that there was something to the right of Netanyahu. But gradually this drift to the right has created a whole new sense of the political debate within Israel," Falk said. "And there is a strong internal Israeli opposition to any sense that the Palestinian people in any diminished way deserve a state of their own."

Falk, an American law professor who is Jewish, has come to the end of a six-year term in the independent post and the U.N. Human Rights Council is expected to name a successor soon.

He has long drawn controversy in Israel, in 2008 comparing Israeli military strikes against Hamas in Gaza - during which 1,400 Palestinians were killed and there was widespread destruction in densely populated areas - to those of the Nazis.

Last June he said critics who called him anti-Semitic sought to divert attention from his scrutiny of Israeli policies.

He is to address the U.N. Human Rights Council on Monday, but it was not clear whether Israeli delegates would attend due to an ongoing strike by Israeli foreign ministry staff.

(Editing by Mark Heinrich)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
VultureTX wrote:
“Falk has called Israel’s leaders Nazis, accused them of genocide and suggested former President George W. Bush ordered the destruction of the twin towers. He has posted a cartoon of a dog wearing a yarmulke with a Star of David, eating a human carcass and urinating on Lady Justice.”

/and you wonder why we accuse people of being anti-semites; well stop agreeing with Falk.

Mar 21, 2014 5:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
TBellchambers wrote:
Ethnic cleansing. The next war will start not in Sevastopol but Jerusalem

There are now only a few days left before a humiliated US Secretary, John Kerry, will be forced to publicly announce that months of hard negotiation, to bring about a peace settlement between the Palestinians and Israel, have once again deliberately ended in failure by the announcement of the Israeli government of thousands more illegal homes to be built in the West Bank, plus the daily killing of civilians in Gaza, Lebanon and Jordan by the IDF.

This strategy by the Netanyahu government was prepared months ago in order to scupper any talk of peace whilst limiting humiliation to the White House. There was never any intention by nuclear Israel to allow a Palestinian state on the West Bank with its capital In East Jerusalem.

The Israeli government has for years used the device of ambiguity not only to colonise the Occupied Territories but also to develop a nuclear arsenal estimated to be the most powerful in the world after the US and Russia. There is no European state either within the EU, or outside, that has a nuclear offensive capability to match that of Israel, a state of just 8 million people.

However, one fact is indisputable: Netanyahu speaks and acts ONLY for his minority right-wing constituencies in Israel and America NOT for the worldwide Jewish diaspora where he is variously considered either a rabble rouser or a dangerous demagogue. It is indeed a tragedy that such a self-serving politician and his cohort in the US Congress can cause such global instability as he continues his dangerous colonisation in violation of the Geneva Conventions and in contempt of worldwide condemnation.

Meanwhile, the EU parliament has, as yet, still not abrogated the EU-Israel Association Agreement that effectively pays for Israeli aggression and land expropriation. The EU needs to act to stop all bilateral trade with the Israeli state until such time as it conforms to international law and also exposes its undeclared nuclear arsenal to IAEA inspection.

Mar 21, 2014 5:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
17plusOne wrote:
Tinman threatened to kill Nilla Buddy and my Little Buddy for refusing to nook Fair-To-See (Persia), so I sent those 2 pups off duty. I’m on duty now.
Got oil, tinman?

Mar 21, 2014 5:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.