JPMorgan defeats appeal in U.S. silver price-fixing lawsuit

NEW YORK Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:11pm EDT

The offices of JP Morgan in the Canary Wharf district of London, January 28, 2014. REUTERS/Simon Newman

The offices of JP Morgan in the Canary Wharf district of London, January 28, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Simon Newman

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Silver investors failed to show that JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) conspired to drive down the metal's price, and an antitrust lawsuit accusing the largest U.S. bank of price-fixing should be dismissed, a federal appeals court ruled.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the investors, who traded COMEX silver futures and options contracts, failed to show that JPMorgan violated federal antitrust and commodities laws by having distorted silver prices at their expense between 2007 and 2010.

Among the allegations were that the bank would amass huge short positions that market conditions did not justify, and make "fake" late-day trades when market volume was thin.

Thursday's order upheld a March 2013 ruling by U.S. District Judge Robert Patterson, who also sits in Manhattan.

Christopher Lovell, a partner at Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson representing the investors, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. JPMorgan spokesman Brian Marchiony declined to comment.

Investors had filed at least 43 complaints in 2010 and 2011 that accused banks of amassing hundreds of millions of dollars in illegal profit through silver price-fixing.

After the lawsuits were consolidated, HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA.L) was dropped from the case in September 2011, leaving New York-based JPMorgan as the main defendant.

In Thursday's order, a three-judge 2nd Circuit panel said it could not infer from allegations that JPMorgan took large and "uneconomic" short positions in silver that the bank intended to manipulate prices, or conspired with floor brokers to do so.

"An inference of intent cannot be drawn from the mere fact that JPMorgan had a strong short position," the panel said.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission began probing silver price-fixing in 2008, and two years later proposed regulations to give it greater power to stop the practice.

The case is In re: Commodity Exchange Inc Silver Futures and Options Trading Litigation, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 13-1416.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Andrew Hay)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
GLAWREN wrote:
Vampire Squid!

Mar 27, 2014 7:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Mandyann wrote:
Has anyone did any research on the connection to this Judge, his extensive family roots & ties to the suppression of silver in general. This is not the 1st time this judge has ruled in favor of this bank under the sameish charges of manipulation of silver. Also his father has ties to suppression of silver. There is a whole research report in regard to his ties. http://www.silvermarketnewsonline.com/articles/CorruptJudgePatterson_Savoie012114.pdf This paper was written I think when he ruled in favor of JP Morgan the 1st time in December someone sued for silver manipulation. This Judge is corrupt! Just sayin

Apr 02, 2014 10:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.