Lawmakers bash Obama administration's 'delusional' Syria policy

WASHINGTON Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:19pm EDT

U.S. President Barack Obama waves after delivering a speech at Palais des Beaux-Arts (BOZAR) in Brussels, Belgium March 26, 2014. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. President Barack Obama waves after delivering a speech at Palais des Beaux-Arts (BOZAR) in Brussels, Belgium March 26, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. lawmakers lashed out at the Obama administration's handling of Syria's civil war on Wednesday, demanding a stronger American response to the conflict and better communication from the White House about its plans.

Senator Robert Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, expressed deep frustration after Anne Patterson, the assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs, declined to answer a question about strategy in a public setting.

"I have a problem with a generic answer to a generic question that I can't believe is classified," Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat, said during a committee hearing.

Heated exchanges during questioning of Patterson and Tom Countryman, another assistant secretary of state, underscored the often deep divide between Congress - both Republicans and President Barack Obama's fellow Democrats - and the administration on foreign policy.

The emotional hearing came a day after Senate Democrats dropped from a Ukraine aid bill reforms of the International Monetary Fund sought by the Obama administration, saying they felt it was more important to move the bill quickly.

Members of the Foreign Relations panel in particular are frustrated by the administration's failure to do more in Syria, where 140,000 people have been killed, millions have become refugees and thousands of foreign militant fighters have been trained as rebels have fought to oust President Bashar al-Assad.


Senator Bob Corker, the committee's top Republican, called one answer from Patterson "major, misleading baloney."

"I can't imagine you actually saying that in this setting. That would indicate to people that we have a military strategy relative to Syria, and that ... could not be further from the truth," the Tennessee senator said.

Arizona Republican John McCain, a frequent critic of Obama's foreign policy, called U.S. Syria policy "a colossal failure."

"The greatest nation in the world has sat by and watched this genocide taking place," the senator said.

The Foreign Relations Committee voted in May to authorize sending military aid to the Syrian opposition and approved in September the use of U.S. military force in the conflict.

But significant lethal aid has not yet been sent and the White House, after resistance from other members of Congress, dropped plans to bomb Syria after agreeing with Russia to destroy Assad's chemical weapons cache.

Corker disputed an assertion from Countryman, who handles nonproliferation issues, that the chemical weapons plan had been constructive.

"I disagree with you strongly. With respect, I think you're delusional," Corker said.

The session ended after the committee requested a classified hearing with testimony about what military action is being considered, what actions are being taken and an update on the destruction of Assad's chemical weapons.

"And if you can't do this, then let us know so none of us are wasting our time," Menendez said.

(Editing by Jan Paschal)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (10)
unionwv wrote:
Here We see an example of Obama’s “recalibration” of U.S. relations with foreign governments.

One miserable, unfocussed disaster after another.

Mar 26, 2014 8:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Bakhtin wrote:
Warmongering Republicans whining. Hardly news….

And if Obama started a war, they would all be saying “how are we paying for this?” and “You complained about Bush but Obama is the same”

Nothing constructive. Nothing to offer. Just whining. It is pathetic.

Mar 26, 2014 8:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
xyz2055 wrote:
Anyone notice Europe , China, Russia or the UN jumping into the Syrian civil war to stop the killings? Why is it the U.S.’s responsibility to solve all the worlds problems? Other than an all out military action in Syria..what does Mr. McCain think would be effective? Same question for the Ukraine. NO ONE has spent more blood and treasure on these conflicts than the U.S. And the U.S. followed the recommendations of Mr. McCain and his cohorts in Afghanistan and Iraq…the effect? Bunch of people killed, a lot of money spent and things are actually worse in those countries. I vote that the world takes care of itself for a change.

Mar 26, 2014 10:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.