House backs one-year delay to doctor pay cuts under Medicare

WASHINGTON Thu Mar 27, 2014 6:56pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives approved legislation on Thursday to avert looming pay cuts for doctors under the government's Medicare health insurance program for older Americans and the disabled.

The measure to postpone the cuts was approved in a voice vote after an earlier delay signaled potential trouble mustering support for the bill, which halts the pay cuts for one year.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, said the bill would be brought up for a vote in that chamber on Monday, with no opportunity to amend it, meaning that if it passes it will go straight to President Barack Obama to sign into law. Reid said a supermajority of 60 votes would be required. The Senate has 100 members.

The measure would once again give doctors a one-year reprieve from a 24 percent cut that would otherwise take effect on April 1 under the Medicare payment formula, known as the sustainable growth rate, or SGR.

But House passage was nonetheless a let-down for doctors' groups, which have become frustrated with the uncertainty of temporary measures and have been lobbying for a longer-term fix to the payments formula that was set up in the 1990s. The formula has never been fully enacted and instead has been overridden 16 times by Congress.

The payments affect doctors treating patients under Medicare, which pays for healthcare for nearly 51 million people in the United States who are 65 and older or disabled.

The American Medical Association said it was "extremely disappointed" that House lawmakers had given up on a complete repeal of the old payments formula.

"There was bipartisan, bicameral support for reform this year, yet too many in Congress lacked the courage and wherewithal to permanently fix Medicare to improve care for patients and provide greater certainty for physician practices," the AMA said in the statement issued after the House vote.

Key lawmakers in both parties and both chambers have said they favor reforming the payments formula but they disagree on whether and how to fund the large, $138 billion price tag of a permanent fix. Meanwhile, some Republicans said Thursday, the one-year repair was the best they could do.

If Congress did not act, doctors that treat Medicare patients might say, "Gosh, we just can't do this, that appointment is canceled; we are just going to stop serving Medicare patients," Representative Fred Upton, chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, said on the House floor.

PATH TO PASSAGE?

On Wednesday, House Speaker John Boehner, a Republican, said he and the Senate's Reid had agreed to a proposal to delay the pay cuts for another year. Boehner said he expected both chambers to act swiftly.

But the plan almost came unglued Thursday after House leaders fast-tracked the measure to the floor under a provision requiring a two-thirds majority vote, only to discover that they might not get the two-thirds needed if they called the roll.

After lawmakers who are also doctors huddled in a room off the House floor with the Republican leadership, the leaders decided to try to pass the bill on a voice vote, which succeeded after no one in either party insisted on having a roll call.

Democratic Representative Gerald Connolly told reporters the "chatter on the floor" was that Senate Democrats, including Reid, had urged House Democrats not to insist on a roll call, to allow the bill to advance so the Senate could take action.

(Reporting by Susan Cornwell and Susan Heavey; Editing by Doina Chiacu, Dan Grebler and Richard Chang)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
AlkalineState wrote:
So much for the GOP’s stated plan of cost controls. They just wrote the medical and pharmaceutical lobby another blank check.

Mar 27, 2014 1:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
tatman wrote:
kick the can down the road another year, creating more uncertainty. anything to not do their job and address america’s long term issues. just like their 50+ votes over four years costing millions of dollars of taxpayer money to try to destroy the ACA instead of working in a bipartisan way to make the bill better and strengthen the law. i see their strategy, though — get as many seniors to vote for them in the midterm elections, then shaft ‘em right afterwards by screwing their medicare…

Mar 27, 2014 1:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
riposte wrote:
Our entire medical system, now with obamacare in control, needs to be overhauled….with all the changes to the law, it isn’t the law, that the legislative branch voted for…someone should take it to the supreme court again, as it is no longer the law, that the supreme court reviewed and decided upon…then, start at square one…..as for medicare, if they voted to cut the payments down, many more doctors would quit, retire, or just plain do without medicare patients…as it is, there aren’t enough doctors to go around….

Mar 27, 2014 1:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.