Kiev-loyal Orthodox church doubtful of its future in Crimea

SIMFEROPOL, Crimea/KIEV Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:27pm EDT

Related Topics

SIMFEROPOL, Crimea/KIEV (Reuters) - Ukrainian Orthodox Christians who are loyal to Kiev feel increasingly unsafe in Crimea after Russia's annexation of the Black Sea peninsula and some have already left, church leaders said on Monday.

Since the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the advent of an independent Ukraine, the country's Orthodox faithful have been split between the Kiev and Moscow Patriarchates. The much larger Moscow-based Church does not recognize its Kiev-based rival, which is not part of the global Orthodox communion.

The estimated 220,000 Crimeans loyal to the Kiev Patriarchate have long felt marginalized because of the region's strong pro-Russian sympathies, but Moscow's takeover of the peninsula has fuelled their feelings of vulnerability.

Their misgivings echo those of another minority, the Crimean Tatars, a mostly Muslim Turkic people, about Russia's annexation. Crimea's majority ethnic Russian population voted strongly in favor of joining Russia in a March 16 referendum branded illegal by Kiev and the West.

"The families of our clerics have all left, the clerics are still here but they will also leave immediately if forced to take a Russian passport," community leader Metropolitan Kliment told Reuters by telephone from an undisclosed location.

"Our churches could be thrown out onto the street today or tomorrow because we are not in line with Russian laws," said Kliment, who said he had already left Crimea himself due to safety concerns.

Kliment said the patriarchate's only church in the port city of Sevastopol was now effectively shut because it sits in a Ukrainian military base now controlled by Russians "who don't even let the priests in at times, not to mention anybody else".

TRADING ACCUSATIONS

The rival patriarchates and their followers have exchanged accusations in Crimea, with some loyal to Moscow accusing the Kiev-allied priests of trying to run away with church property including revered icons and other religious objects.

Those loyal to Kiev have said clerics serving under the Moscow Patriarchate have sought to take over their churches and had sometimes been accompanied by Russian soldiers to enforce their message.

Russia has cited alleged threats to worshippers of the Moscow-backed church in pressing its right to send in troops to Ukraine to protect its nationals and Russian speakers. Patriarch Kirill, head of the Russian Orthodox Church in Moscow, has close ties to President Vladimir Putin.

Patriarch Filaret, the head of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, Kiev Patriarchate, said in Kiev on Monday that Crimea's new Russia-backed authorities had offered written assurances that his community would be left in peace.

"(But) it's hard to believe promises at the moment - they promise one thing and then do something else, so if they don't fulfil their promises we will take the Crimean Muslims up on their offer," Filaret told a news conference.

In an unusual inter-faith gesture of solidarity, Crimea's Muslim Tatar minority has offered to allow Kiev-loyal Orthodox Christian worshippers to hold services in their mosques.

The 300,000-strong Tatars, who make up less than 15 percent of Crimea's population of two million, are haunted by memories of Moscow's mass deportation of their community to Central Asia in 1944, during World War Two. On Saturday, they called for "ethnic and territorial autonomy".

In Simferopol, where the Kiev-loyal Orthodox Church is headquartered, Father Volodymyr said services were being held as usual for now but added congregations were noticeably smaller.

"Fewer people are coming because some families, especially those with small children, have left," he said by phone.

Archbishop Kliment has banned priests speaking to media in person due to security fears. The Kiev patriarchate has 20 churches in Crimea presided over by 15 priests.

(Editing by Gareth Jones)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Zaichusha wrote:
This is a very strange report. I understand it is impossible to explain in a short article the complexity of the religious situation in Ukraine and in Crimea in particular but… “The estimated 220,000 Crimeans loyal to the Kiev Patriarchate ” and “..20 churches in Crimea presided over by 15 priests”. The so-called Kiev patriarchate (not recognized by any canonical orthodox church) have no influence in Crimea whatsoever. That is why the 220,000 figure chocked me. If we divide 220,000 by 20 churches, we get 11,000 parishioners per church roughly. Let me tell you, if you have 11,000 people who want to participate in church services, you will build 10 small to medium size churches. Where do the author got the numbers?

“In an unusual inter-faith gesture of solidarity, Crimea’s Muslim Tatar minority has offered to allow Kiev-loyal Orthodox Christian worshippers to hold services in their mosques.” Crimean Tatars wrong sided again and now don’t know what to do next. They supported Maidan. Mustafa Dzhemilev (an ex-leader of Medjilis (unofficial parliament)) lived there and have spoken from the scene all the time. Now, they realized they lost again. Instead of starting new life and embracing the whole lot of opportunities Russia reserved especially for them, they insult Russians one more time. Very short-sited position that will lead they nowhere.

Mar 31, 2014 3:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus