Former U.S. regulator says Fannie, Freddie investors stand to lose

WASHINGTON Thu Apr 3, 2014 7:50pm EDT

1 of 2. James Lockhart speaks during a news conference about a plan to ease mortgage payments for troubled borrowers through mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in Washington in this November 11, 2008 file photo. Lockhart, a former regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac who is now with private equity firm WL Ross & Co, on April 3, 2014 said investors are making 'worthless' bets snapping up the stock of the two mortgage finance firms.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Roberts/Files

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - James Lockhart, a former regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac who is now with private equity firm WL Ross & Co, on Thursday said investors are making "worthless" bets snapping up the stock of the two mortgage finance firms.

As the U.S. Congress debates what to do with the taxpayer-owned companies, some hedge funds have invested aggressively over the past year in Fannie and Freddie, which have returned to profitability after a government rescue in 2008. These investors hope to profit if legislative efforts stall and the government ends up selling its controlling stake.

"It's a stretch," said Lockhart, the former chief of the Federal Housing Finance Agency who is now vice chairman at WL Ross. "The stock and the preferred (stock) is worthless and should be worthless," he told Reuters.

WL Ross & Co is headed by Wilbur Ross, a billionaire investor who has made big profits buying up distressed debt.

Paulson & Co and Perry Capital LLC are among the hedge funds that have bought preferred shares in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which lost almost all their value after regulators seized the companies in 2008.

Lockhart, whose firm is shying away from investing in the two mortgage giants, noted that they would not have survived the financial crisis without a federal bailout.

Investors in the firms are pushing for lawmakers to reconsider plans to wind them down, and have filed lawsuits challenging bailout terms that require the companies to sweep all their profits into the U.S. Treasury as dividends.

Lockhart, who oversaw the $187.5 billion bailout, declined to comment on the litigation. He said, however, that the rescue was designed to be a short-term solution.

Fannie and Freddie have now returned $202.9 billion in dividend payments to the Treasury for the taxpayer aid.

"We have to figure out how to get the private market back into the mortgage market," said Lockhart. "It's going to be a question of how to do that without hurting the housing market. Obviously, a lot of that will be up to Congress."

(Reporting by Margaret Chadbourn; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
MartinSlawik wrote:
James Lockhart from WL Ross & Co have no knowledge about bankruptcies,… but will advise investors …

Apr 04, 2014 2:25am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Michelle12449 wrote:
First of call, the article clearly stated Lockedhart is a “former” regulator, by that alone I will ignore any statement that makes. As a “former” regulator, their former administrator obviously “caused” the collapse and current condition of FNMA/FMCC.
Secondly the feds currently holds roughly 80% of FNMA/FMCC. Hence they can dictates the playing field. HOWEVER! if shareholder slowly re-acquire these shares from the government, the feds will no longer be the majority share holder and have less control hence why Ackman continue his effort in the purchasing of FNMA/FMCC.
If you truly want FNMA/FMCC to be out of the fed’s control, then chip in and buy more FNMA/FMCC like what Ackman has been doing.

Apr 04, 2014 11:26am EDT  --  Report as abuse
peace1530 wrote:
Since James Lockhart was the former regulator of Fannie Mae, he proved to the world he was the biggest looser ever, and know again he is trying to prove to the world that he is the biggest JA looser.
Good lock dummy.

Apr 06, 2014 5:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.