Pimco's Gross sees low, mid-single digit returns in 2014

NEW YORK Thu Apr 3, 2014 3:34pm EDT

The headquarters of investment firm PIMCO is shown in this photo taken in Newport Beach, California January 26, 2012. REUTERS/Lori Shepler

The headquarters of investment firm PIMCO is shown in this photo taken in Newport Beach, California January 26, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Lori Shepler

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Bill Gross, manager of the world's largest bond fund at Pimco, said on Thursday that asset returns will be in the low- to mid-single digits this year despite relatively positive economic growth.

Expectations for returns for all unleveraged assets and diversified portfolios that attempt to reduce risk and maximize return will be in the low- to mid-single digits, Gross said in his monthly letter to investors.

Gross said Pimco recommends overweighting credit, particularly corporate credit maturing within one to five years as it "should hold current levels if inflation stays low."

The flagship Pimco Total Return Fund, which saw a net $3.1 billion of outflows in March and lagged 95 percent of its peers on the month, according to preliminary Morningstar data, has been significantly underexposed to corporate credit in recent months. It has $232 billion in assets.

In his letter, Gross mentioned Harry Markowitz, one of the pioneers of modern portfolio theory and a 1990 Nobel prize winner, who recently claimed that alternative investments such as hedge funds rarely offer the diversification benefits sought by their investors.

"Overall, because 2014 should be a relatively positive growth environment, carry trades in credit, curve and volatility should produce attractive Sharpe (ratio)/information ratios," Gross said. The higher a fund's Sharpe ratio, the better a fund's returns have been relative to the risk it has taken on.

"Return expectations however, for all unlevered assets and Markowitz generated portfolios will be in the low- to mid-single digits."

Eric Jacobson, senior analyst at Morningstar, has said the Pimco Total Return portfolio began struggling in February as the fund was "very underweight U.S. investment-grade corporate bonds. That would have been a detriment given that the overall investment-grade corporate index returned 104 basis points for February, and returns were better the farther down you went in quality."

Jacobson also said the Pimco Total Return Fund's performance in March struggled because of its significant overweight position in shorter debt and its underweight position in long-date bonds.

In his letter on Thursday, Gross maintained his position on favoring shorter-maturing debt. He said fixed-income securities maturing in five years to 30 years are "at risk" given reduced bond buying from the Federal Reserve. Gross said these bonds that the Fed "has been buying will have to be sold at higher yields to entice the private sector back in."

Pacific Investment Management Co, a unit of European financial services company Allianz SE, had $1.91 trillion in assets as of December 31, according to the firm's website.

(Reporting by Sam Forgione and Jennifer Ablan; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama, Jeffrey Benkoe and Eric Walsh)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
lkofenglish wrote:
these hedge funds are not only wholly lacking in the ability to diversify but even worse are fully correlated to both market “vectoring” (which is ever way the market moves they move in that direction) and are leveraged massively.

treasuries still remain the ONLY non-correlated asset in this…by FAR the worst recovery post World War II.

I think the bulk of these right wing lunatics claiming to know something about economics should be fired, shot and dumped in river somewhere. The only crazier people are the one’s levered tot the hilt in companies that have no chance of revenue growth (General Motors, General Electric) let alone revenues period (Yahoo comes to mind.)

We’re gonna have to be VERY picky about muni debt as that crisis if far from resolved. Certain municipalities still remain firmly in cross hairs of “total annihilation”…and yes, that does include Chicago and the entire State of Illinois…the worst Government, let alone worst run Government…in the History of the United States.

That could be the “tip of the iceberg” however. Massachusetts, Rhode Island, who knows what else…all look pretty dicey to me. So again…”to manage this mammouth default risk and mammouth equity premium you’ll need to be long and strong treasuries.”

Obviously the collapse of China “en toto” is on the table as well. And of course “let’s throw in a crazy KGB Colonel” just to put an exclamation point on it all.

Apr 04, 2014 12:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.