Israel scraps Palestinian prisoner release, seeks review of talks

JERUSALEM Thu Apr 3, 2014 4:04pm EDT

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry makes opening remarks at the start of a U.S.-Algeria Strategic Dialogue with Algerian Foreign Minister Ramtane Lamamra (R) in Algiers April 3, 2014. REUTERS/Jacquelyn Martin/Pool

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry makes opening remarks at the start of a U.S.-Algeria Strategic Dialogue with Algerian Foreign Minister Ramtane Lamamra (R) in Algiers April 3, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Jacquelyn Martin/Pool

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel has called off a planned release of Palestinian prisoners meant to advance the U.S.-sponsored peace process and called for a review of how the troubled negotiations can make progress, an official briefed on the talks said on Thursday.

The official, who declined to be identified, said Israeli negotiators had informed their Palestinian counterparts of the decision in a Wednesday night meeting held at Washington's behest in an effort to avert a collapse of the talks.

The crisis surfaced at the weekend when Israel refused to release a group of Palestinian prisoners under the terms of a previous accord unless it received assurances the Palestinian leadership would continue with negotiations beyond an initial end-April deadline set by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry.

Kerry flew to Jerusalem on Monday and was trying to put the talks back on track. But his mission was jeopardised when Palestinians signed 15 international conventions, mainly through the United Nations, that could give them greater leverage against Israel.

"As the agreements on the release of prisoners were subject to upholding the Palestinian commitment not to go to the U.N., new conditions have been created and Israel will not be able to free the prisoners," Israeli negotiator Tzipi Livni told the Palestinians, according to the official briefed on the talks.

The official further quoted Livni as saying: "The sides should now review how it is possible to make progress in the negotiations." She urged the Palestinians to withdraw from the new conventions they had signed.

A top Palestinian official said they would not backtrack from their decision to join international conventions and were now within their rights to join all U.N. agencies.

"Our response must be to join all the international institutions until we reach the International Criminal Court," prisoners affairs minister Issa Qaraqe told Reuters.

'UNHELPFUL ACTIONS'

Joining the court could eventually allow Palestinians to lodge formal legal cases against Israel, and is seen by the United States and Israel as the most dangerous step they could take.

Signing the conventions was "the correct response to the Israeli game of not releasing the fourth group of prisoners on time...Israel is the one who began this and took the unilateral decision. Today, it announced its decision formally," Qaraqe said.

The United States has criticized "unhelpful, unilateral actions" by both sides and Kerry sought on Thursday to cast the crisis in a more hopeful light, telling reporters while visiting Algeria that the Israeli-Palestinian dialogue "remains open".

During the negotiators' meeting "there was progress made in narrowing some of the questions that have arisen as a result of the last few days but there is still a gap and that gap will have to be closed and closed fairly soon," Kerry said.

In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that U.S. officials "haven't been informed of any such decision" by the Israelis to call off the planned release.

Harf declined to explain the nature of the progress that Kerry cited and acknowledged that the talks were at "a very critical point."

Aimed at creating a Palestinian state and ending a decades-long conflict, the negotiations have also stalled over Palestinian opposition to Israel's demand that it be recognized as a Jewish state, and the issue of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Kerry has repeatedly visited the region since reviving the talks last July in a bid to avoid deadlocks that have plagued past diplomacy. He put the onus of success on the feuding sides.

"It is really their decision, and it has to be made. They understand what the choices are, they understand what the stakes are, and they understand each of them their own limits and dynamics," he said.

Israeli officials in Jerusalem said there was still a small chance that an agreement might be reached to extend the talks. They said the next 72 hours would be critical.

Palestinians want an independent state in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem - lands captured by Israel in a 1967 war. While all parties say negotiations are the best path to peace, Palestinians say they may eventually resort to international bodies to force Israel to make concessions.

The U.N. General Assembly voted to recognize Palestine as a non-member state in 2012, entitling it to join the conventions that Abbas signed on Tuesday. These include agreements against discrimination against women and for the rights of disabled people, as well as the Geneva Conventions.

U.S. support is key to Abbas's administration in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Around $500 million in annual aid to the Palestinian Authority helps keep its public sector and security forces afloat. The other Palestinian territory, Gaza, is governed by Abbas's Islamist Hamas rivals, who spurn Palestinian coexistence with Israel.

Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad al-Malki on Wednesday played down the prospect of U.S. sanctions in response to Abbas's signing of the 15 international conventions, as they dealt with social and human rights rather than the quest for full membership in U.N. bodies.

(Additional reporting by Lesley Wroughton in Algiers, Crispian Balmer in Jerusalem, Noah Browning and Ali Sawafta in Ramallah and Will Dunham in Washington; Writing by Patrick Markey and Dan Williams; Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (32)
The Israelis have never been serious about these “peace talks”; they are used as a convenient distraction from the fact that the Israeli government is subsidizing thousands of Jews-Only housing units built on lands that the Israelis seized by force during the Six-day War in 1967.

Israel has no intention of allowing the Arab refugees, who were forced from their homes by the wars, to ever return to their homes in what is now considered Israeli territory.

Israel insists on garrisoning its troops in any future Palestinian state; the military occupation would continue as before.

The proposed Palestinian state would not be a contiguous land mass; it would be a series of cordoned-off and disconnected “reservations” for the unwanted Muslim Arabs living in the region… a dumping ground “state”.

Although the Palestinians recognized Israel’s right to exist, back in 1993, at Oslo; the Jews have since moved the goal posts. The current Israeli demand is that the Palestinians recognize Israel’s “right to exist, as a Jewish state and the national homeland of the Jewish People”. I call that, “demand creep”.

There is no linkage between the Palestinian conflict and the fate of the convicted traitor, Jonathan Pollard. Recent suggestions that freeing Pollard would somehow salvage the latest round of “peace talks” are grim evidence that Obama and company are desperate… they’ll try just about anything at this point… anything but common sense, that is.

Apr 03, 2014 7:38am EDT  --  Report as abuse
unionwv wrote:
“The proposed Palestinian state would not be a contiguous land mass…”

Welcome to the “United” States, new_york_loner.

Hawaii, Alaska, Lower forty-eight.

Apr 03, 2014 8:34am EDT  --  Report as abuse
That’s a totally false analopgy, unionwv.

Americans living in Hawaii are free to travel to the remainder of the contiguous United States, or to Alaska, and Alaskans are free to travel to the remainder of the contiguous USA, or to Hawaii, without needing any “paperwork” and/or having to undergo a strip search.

This would not be the case for the Palestinians living in these disconnected reservations for Muslim Arabs… their travel would be severely restricted… the unwanted Arabs of Palestine would be virtually incarcerated in these festering human dump sites.

Apr 03, 2014 9:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.