Poland's PM says NATO to boost military presence within weeks

WARSAW Sat Apr 5, 2014 9:17am EDT

Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk arrives at a European Union leaders summit in Brussels March 21, 2014. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir

Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk arrives at a European Union leaders summit in Brussels March 21, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Francois Lenoir

Related Topics

WARSAW (Reuters) - NATO will strengthen its presence in Poland within weeks, Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on Saturday, a move that could help allay fears in eastern European states for their security after Russia's seizure of Ukraine's Crimea region.

Tusk spoke three days after foreign ministers from the U.S.-led alliance ordered military commanders to devise plans for reinforcing NATO defenses among its eastern European members, including Poland, a neighbor of Ukraine.

Russia's annexation of Crimea after the fall of Ukraine's pro-Russian president to mass protests has caused the deepest crisis in East-West relations since the Cold War, when most east European countries were under Soviet domination from Moscow.

But, in an apparent gesture to minimize the risk of any conflict with Russia, NATO has suggested it is more likely to beef up eastern European security through rotating reinforcements rather than permanent basing of substantial additional combat forces there.

"The strengthening of NATO's presence (in Poland), also military presence, has become a fact and will be visible in the coming days, weeks," Tusk told the broadcaster TVN. "The discussion is not about if, but rather about the scale, pace and some technical aspects of strengthening Poland's security."

Military planners have been asked to come back with detailed ideas by April 15. A NATO official said it was premature to give details as planners are still working on options.

But the measures could include sending NATO soldiers and equipment to eastern European allies for short-term reinforcements and exercises, as well as ensuring NATO's rapid-reaction force could deploy more quickly.

Poland, which spent more than four decades under the sway of the Soviet Union in a divided Europe after World War Two, is eager to see more U.S. troops based on its soil.

Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski said earlier this week that Warsaw would be "fully satisfied" if NATO stationed two heavy brigades in Poland. But that seems unlikely.

SPHERE OF INFLUENCE

On Thursday, NATO's secretary-general said in response to Russian concerns that what NATO was doing was in line with a 1997 cooperation pact with Russia. Under that pact, NATO agreed to defend east European members through reinforcements rather than by permanently stationing extra combat forces there.

Russia regards its fellow former Soviet republic Ukraine as within its traditional sphere of influence and has warned against Kiev's new pro-European tilt and what it perceives as a threatening sign of Western encroachment.

White House deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes, accompanying President Barack Obama to Europe in late March, told reporters that the United States would increase rotations of ground and naval forces to NATO allies in eastern Europe, in addition to the extra planes it had already sent, and expected European NATO allies to join Washington in this effort.

Last month, responding to a request from Warsaw, the United States decided to increase the scale of its military exercises in Poland, sending to the country 12 U.S. F-16 fighter jets and 300 personnel.

Previously, there was just a small detachment of several U.S. military personnel on the ground in Poland assisting in the training of Polish pilots. The United States also has plans to deploy elements of its missile shield in Poland by 2018.

(Reporting by Marcin Goettig in Warsaw and Adrian Croft in Brussels; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
carlmartel wrote:
The West can move ground battalions and air squadrons in and out on maneuvers with Polish forces for “training,” but the 1997 agreement prohibits permanent reinforcements. The other way would be to pay for Polish units and other eastern troops that would be part of the national armed forces not covered under the 1997 accord. This may need to come in the form of trade concessions that let NATO’s eastern allies “earn” the money to pay for new troops, arms, and training. NATO’s temporary units on “maneuvers” can aid the new units with training exercises to raise their proficiency to the levels demonstrated by the Russians in Crimea. The West was unpleasantly surprised by the efficiency of Russia’s Crimean operation after US and NATO failures in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and elsewhere. Stupid Americans may say that we removed the Taliban, Saddam, and Qaddafi, but the excessive costs and the losses of oil for the West’s mechanized economies and militaries have left the West nearly bankrupt and war weary. The only cheerleaders for our aggressive policies are stupid children who have never known war and worthless geezers who can’t fight anymore.

Apr 05, 2014 2:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
thorpy63 wrote:
Agreements are null & void after Russia ripped up the rule book by invading a part of Ukraine so the Poles can invite who they like to do what they like in their own country

Apr 05, 2014 2:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
carlmartel wrote:
Addition: My last sentence for the comment posted 2:27 pm should read:

“The only cheerleaders for our aggressive policies are stupid children who have never known war, paid workers who must praise what the wise abhor, and worthless geezers who can’t fight anymore.”

Apr 05, 2014 3:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus