GM ignition switch case could lead to criminal charges: Senator

WASHINGTON Sun Apr 6, 2014 1:54pm EDT

1 of 2. The General Motors logo is seen outside its headquarters at the Renaissance Center in Detroit, Michigan August 25, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Jeff Kowalsky

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - General Motors should make restitution to victims' families and face criminal action if merited for the way it handled defective ignition switches that caused fatal auto accidents, U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill said on Sunday.

McCaskill, as chairwoman of the Senate subcommittee on consumer protection and product safety, led a blistering round of questioning of GM chief executive officer Mary Barra last week. In an appearance on ABC's "This Week" show, McCaskill said GM now faced "a real moment of truth" as it pursues an internal investigation of the ignition switches and the automaker's response to the problem.

At least 13 people were killed in accidents caused by switches that shut down cars. In 2006, GM changed the faulty part but did not change its identifying part number, which McCaskill said showed an intent to deceive.

Asked on Sunday if someone should go to jail in the matter, she cited a 2010 Supreme Court ruling that said the government cannot restrict political donations by corporations.

"You know we had the Citizens United case where our Supreme Court said corporations are people ... but if in fact they are people, there needs to be some criminal accountability depending on what the facts of the investigation show," McCaskill, a Democrat, said. "I know the Justice Department is taking a hard look at this."

Another member of the subcommittee, Republican Senator Kelly Ayotte, said GM's actions amounted to criminal deception.

McCaskill also joined those calling for GM to establish a victims' compensation fund.

"Now it's time for them to come clean, be transparent and most of all make all victims whole no matter when this deadly ignition caused heartbreak in their families," she said.

(Writing by Bill Trott; Editing by Jim Loney, Bernard Orr)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (17)
Overcast451 wrote:
If only the real responsible parties were to get some real jail time – it would help fix this. Sadly; we all know a couple of patsies will be found to suffer the consequences that the rich execs deserve for making the decisions.

The CEO should always be liable for the actions of his/her company – if they were serving at the time the crime was committed. If the CEO cannot ‘know it all’ – maybe they are “too big to exist”.

Apr 06, 2014 2:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ceosrscum wrote:
go after all the ceos and their criminal gang of peons back when all this race to the bottom on wages and quality was going on during this event….

Apr 06, 2014 2:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
tmc wrote:
LMFAO!! As Overcast says, maybe some patsy, but the real criminals? LMFAO!

Apr 06, 2014 2:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus