Supreme Court declines early look at NSA surveillance case

WASHINGTON Mon Apr 7, 2014 1:37pm EDT

A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington December 3, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington December 3, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned down a long-shot request for a ruling on whether the U.S. government's gathering of Americans' phone records is unlawful.

The justices' refusal to intervene means the case will go forward in the appeals court, as scheduled.

Plaintiffs Larry Klayman and Charles Strange had said the issue was so important the high court should not wait for a Washington federal appeals court to rule in the case concerning the National Security Agency.

The high court rarely hears an appeal before an appeals court has ruled.

The Supreme Court will likely be asked to hear the case after the appeals court issues its ruling.

Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden disclosed the massive phone record collection to U.S. and British media in June 2013. Documents provided by Snowden showed a U.S. surveillance court had secretly approved the collection of millions of raw daily phone records in America, such as the length of calls and the numbers dialed.

Klayman is a conservative lawyer and Strange is the father of a U.S. cryptologist technician killed in Afghanistan in 2011. They won the case in U.S. District Court in Washington in December. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ruled that the program was likely unlawful, and the government appealed.

The case is Klayman v. Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, 13-931.

(Editing by Howard Goller and Bernadette Baum)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Overcast451 wrote:
No doubt they’ll do whatever they can to avoid this one.

Apr 07, 2014 11:30am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Obsilutely wrote:
Maybe we should have told them it introduced another method of political bribery for corporations. They’d hear it then.

Apr 07, 2014 2:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SaveRMiddle wrote:
No reason to waste the time of the UnSupremes.

We already know the vote would be 5-4 in favor of NSA.

Apr 07, 2014 5:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.