Guantanamo panel weighs transfer of suspected al Qaeda fighter

ARLINGTON, Virginia Tue Apr 8, 2014 11:39am EDT

The Northeast gate marks the end of U.S. soil as the road leads into Cuba at Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, March 8, 2013. Picture taken March 8, 2013. REUTERS/Bob Strong

The Northeast gate marks the end of U.S. soil as the road leads into Cuba at Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, March 8, 2013. Picture taken March 8, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Bob Strong

Related Topics

ARLINGTON, Virginia (Reuters) - A suspected al Qaeda fighter held at Guantanamo Bay U.S. military prison could return to extremism if freed, a Pentagon assessment said at a parole-style hearing on Tuesday, but the man's defenders contended he was no threat to the United States.

Ghaleb Nassar al-Bihani, a 34- or 35-year-old Yemeni, is suspected of having fought in Afghanistan for the al Qaeda extremist group, according to a U.S. Defense Department prisoner profile. The U.S. military is unsure of his exact age.

A Defense Department profile read at the televised hearing of the Periodic Review Board contended that one of al-Bihani's brothers was a member of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and six brothers had fought in Afghanistan.

His family has close ties to high-ranking al Qaeda members "and almost certainly would induce YM-128 to reengage in extremist activities if he were repatriated to Yemen," the profile said, using al-Bihani's inmate number.

Al-Bihani was captured and sent to Guantanamo Bay in January 2002. He has expressed fear of returning to the Middle East and has said he wants a life outside of jihad, or Islamic holy war, but it is unclear if he really wants to give it up, the profile said.

Speaking on al-Bihani's behalf, his personal representative from the U.S. Navy said he had been a cook in Afghanistan. He had received training similar to that of a U.S. Army private and fell short of being a threat to the United States.

His lawyer, Pardiss Kebriaei, said al-Bihani had chronic health problems and was willing to return to Yemen or Saudi Arabia. But he preferred to be sent to a third country, such as Qatar, Spain or in Latin America, the lawyer said.

During the 22-minute public portion of the hearing, al-Bihani sat at a table flanked by his representative, lawyer and a translator. The bearded, balding al-Bihani was dressed in a sand-colored prison shirt and made no comments.

The review board was not shown. The hearing was transmitted via closed-circuit television to a viewing site near the Pentagon.

Bihani's hearing before the Periodic Review Board was to re-examine whether he should still be held without charge at Guantanamo Bay, the U.S. military prison in Cuba, or be transferred.

The review board is designed to help close the prison. About 70 of the 154 inmates cannot be prosecuted for various reasons, but are considered too dangerous to release.

The Periodic Review Board was set up in October. It has heard three cases involving suspected Yemeni bodyguards to Osama bin Laden, an al Qaeda founder killed by U.S. commandos in 2011.

It has ruled one man eligible to be sent back to Yemen and said a second should continue to be held. The panel has not decided the third case.

(Reporting by Ian Simpson; Editing by Scott Malone and James Dalgleish)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
AZWarrior wrote:
What a mess. Not really a Prisoner of War Camp, not really a prison where you serve your time after a trial. What the hell are we doing? Not our best moment as a nation. The problem is that fighting a “war” with terrorists is not like fighting a war with a nation-state and if we don’t kill them on the battlefield, then after interrogation, just what do we do with them? Holding any human without benefit of either the protection of the Geneva Conventions (covering POWs of nations), or the right to a speedy and fair trial (as befits the crime of terrorism), is to create an almost purgatory like existence with no certainty that there is even the hope of an end.

Apr 08, 2014 1:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus