Top U.S. lawmaker: intelligence top priority in defense bill

WASHINGTON Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:33pm EDT

U.S. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Buck McKeon (R-CA) (2nd R) pauses during his remarks at a news conference on how ''sequestration'' will affect defense funding, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, March 1, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Buck McKeon (R-CA) (2nd R) pauses during his remarks at a news conference on how ''sequestration'' will affect defense funding, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, March 1, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The chairman of the U.S. House Armed Services Committee said on Thursday that intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities would be top priorities as the panel puts together this year's massive defense policy bill.

"If you don't know what somebody else is doing, you don't even know what your risks are," U.S. Representative Buck McKeon said during a meeting with reporters.

"You need to have information. That's always critical in any battle, in any war, in avoiding a war," the California Republican said.

Intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, or ISR, covers everything from unmanned planes such as the high-altitude Global Hawk that Northrop Grumman Corp builds for the Air Force to manned surveillance planes such as Boeing's P-8 aircraft. McKeon said military commanders were reluctant to give up the manned U-2 spy planes that the Air Force wants to retire in favor of the Global Hawk planes.

McKeon's panel this week began formal work on the fiscal 2015 National Defense Authorization Act in the coming months, with an eye toward getting the $600 billion bill through both the House of Representatives and Senate by October 1, before November's mid-term elections.

The huge bill authorizes everything from overall defense spending levels and military pay to procurement of weapons systems and military-related foreign policy issues.

McKeon, who is retiring from the House this year, also said he was concerned that the U.S. submarine fleet was too small.

McKeon said it was unclear if the committee would fund the Navy's request for 22 Boeing Co EA-18G electronic attack planes, which were not included in the Pentagon's base budget proposal.

He said subcommittees were considering the matter, and he did not want to inject his opinion.

"We'll have to look at that and see," he said. "You can go to every weapons system we have and there are reasons why we should have it, or why we should have more of them. But then you have to weigh it against the fact that we don't have the money."

McKeon declined to say what might be on the bottom of his priority list. He is a vocal opponent of the severe across-the-board cuts, under a procedure known as sequestration, forcing the Pentagon to reduce its spending by nearly $1 trillion over a decade.

He said he was not aware of a meeting this week by members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, first reported by Politico, seeking a bipartisan way to address budget concerns and eliminate sequestration.

He said he was interested - within limits.

"I'd like to talk to them and see what they are talking about. What they're thinking about, I don't know. If they are talking about increased taxes, it's probably a non-starter here," McKeon said.

(Additional reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Grant McCool)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
sabrefencer wrote:
Seems that with all the present monies spent, all the people involved, our net intelligence, appears to be just adequate…either our president, is ill informed, or he just wont listen to what is being fed to him…one way or the other, intelligence seems to be synonymous with no action…..

Apr 10, 2014 2:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
brotherkenny4 wrote:
It’s actually about time they simply admit that we do not have a free country and that our votes are meaningless since both parties install people friendly to our banker masters and their soldiers in the CIA, NSA, homeland security and elsewhere. Unfortunately in order for us to have any freedom, it will be up to liberals. You see, conservatives know what the security state is, they simply don’t care, preferring slavery to freedom since they cannot stand living with the results of their own decisions. The liberals on the other hand pretend to want freedom and justice but close their eyes to the reality, and they will not wake up.

Apr 10, 2014 2:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.