Democrats relish chance to attack Republicans over austere budget

WASHINGTON Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:05pm EDT

U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) makes remarks to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Oxon Hill, Maryland, March 6, 2014. REUTERS/Mike Theiler

U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) makes remarks to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Oxon Hill, Maryland, March 6, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Theiler

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrats in the U.S. Congress can hardly contain their glee over the latest Republican budget plan, even though they loathe the details of the blueprint that would cut programs for the poor and funding of medical research.

Democrats view the document as a potent weapon in the November congressional elections and are betting that its emphasis on austerity and cuts to popular programs such as Medicare will provoke a backlash against Republicans.

Crafted by Representative Paul Ryan, the leading Republican voice on fiscal policy, the budget proposes to eliminate annual deficits within 10 years. It won approval on Thursday in the Republican-dominated House of Representatives. Republicans overwhelmingly supported the document, which got no Democratic votes.

Democrats see in the budget a rich vein of material they can use in attack ads against Republicans in this year's congressional elections.

Republicans have been focusing on the troubled rollout of President Barack Obama's healthcare law in their campaign to retake the Senate.

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi on Thursday called it a "moral imperative" to make sure the public was aware of the budget cuts that Republicans are proposing.

"How we reduce it to a bumper sticker, well, we will see," she added.

The House floor debate this week offered a preview of the attack lines Democrats will use on the campaign trail. They lambasted the document as the "worst-ever" Ryan budget and conjured up frightening descriptions of its impact.

"It's like a Dracula in sheep's clothing coming in to suck the blood out of the middle class," said Representative Hank Johnson, a Georgia Democrat.

Added Democrat Hakeem Jeffries of New York: "It is like a heat-seeking missile aimed directly at the American people. It is a parade of horribles too numerous to catalog."


The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is quickly ramping up an attack campaign against Republican candidates in important swing districts, called "Battleground: Middle Class."

An email message distributed by the Democratic National Committee warns of $2,000 in expected tax hikes in the Ryan budget for middle-class families with children. "We've beaten Paul Ryan and his budget before, and with your help, we'll do it again," it reads.

Democrats contend Ryan's budget is evidence that Republicans are intent on giving tax breaks to the wealthy and big corporations, while cutting programs that benefit the middle class and aid the poor.

"This is a pretty clear signal of what would happen if the Republicans ran the table and were successful at taking back the Senate, keeping control of the House and taking the presidency. It's pretty stark," said Representative Earl Blumenauer, a Democrat from Oregon.

Ryan's prominence as the 2012 Republican vice presidential candidate and a potential contender for the party's 2016 presidential nomination bolsters the visibility of the budget. Democrats believe Ryan's high profile could help energize people in their voting base who oppose the Wisconsin lawmaker's budget policies.

But Ryan, who is expected to shift to the chairmanship of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee next year, has defended his fourth and final budget and says he believes it will appeal to Americans who want smaller government and "more control over their lives."

Republican Representative Bill Cassidy, who is seeking to unseat Democratic Senator Mary Landrieu in Louisiana, brushed off the idea the Ryan budget could serve as an effective weapon for Democrats in the congressional election.

Cassidy said he believed the rocky introduction of the healthcare law, known popularly as Obamacare, would overshadow Democrats' message on the budget.

Concerns about Obamacare were the issues that voters in his state cared about, he said, adding: "Everything else is monkey dust."

(Additional reporting by Thomas Ferraro; Editing by Caren Bohan, Peter Cooney and Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (48)
4825 wrote:
LOL. Austere is a word that Democrats don’t know the definition of. The Democrats are very intimate with the words tax and spend. They do not want to cut anything. They just want to raise taxes on you and every other hard working middle-class American. They see you as rich and someone that needs to be taxed. That is right, spend, spend, spend, tax, tax and spend some more. The Democrat motto. They will run this country into bankruptcy if left in office. Most Democrats need to be voted out of office.

Apr 10, 2014 9:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
crod526 wrote:
Monkey dust LOL. The Republicans only care about the rich and corporations. Monkey dust is what they sell the Middle class that is fool enough to vote for them.

Apr 10, 2014 9:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
carnivalchaos wrote:
4825: “Austere is a word that Democrats don’t know the definition of.”

Sure they do. It’s what Europe tried as a means of climbing out of the recession and they found it only made things worse. So they looked across the pond at what Obama was doing that successfully got the US out of its recession that Bush and the Republicans got us into, and Europe switched strategies, adopting a pro growth strategy that worked so well for Obama and the US.

Vote Democrats out of office? We tried that. Recently, in fact. We put Bush in charge and gave him a Republican Senate and House of Representatives. They quickly did one of the most idiotic economic moves in US history. They took the country to war while cutting taxes, enjoyed mostly by the rich, the ones who don’t have to fight the Republican wars. The ones who make money on the Republican wars. It’s something that no other US President had done before.

And when I say “the rich,” I’m not talking about some neighbor that just bought a new SUV. I’m talking about billionaires and multi-millionaires, the ones using their money to control our government for their financial benefit.

Yes, Bush and the Republicans took us into 2 wars and cut taxes for the rich. They inherited a surplus and immediately squandered that, replacing it with record deficits. They then led us into the worst economic crash since the Great Depression.

Republican Presidents are also to blame for the corportist Supreme Court Justices who just ruled that the American people do not have a right to stop special interests from bribing our government into submission. All of the conservative Justices ruled in favor of banning any limits on campaign donations by anyone. Thanks Chief Justice Roberts. The liberal Justices all ruled in favor of allowing limits on how much a person can give a politician. In other words, we can’t end corruption in our government until we have a majority of liberal Justices on the Court. Therefore, if we want to end corruption, we have to keep a Democrat in the White House so that we can eventually have a majority of liberal Justices on the SC. You don’t have to like that, but those are the facts.

Apr 10, 2014 10:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.