Parents of Texas 'affluenza' teen to pay part of state treatment

FORT WORTH, Texas Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:09pm EDT

Related Topics

FORT WORTH, Texas (Reuters) - A Texas judge, who was criticized for sentencing a wealthy Texas teen to probation after he killed four people while driving drunk, on Friday ordered his parents to pay a small part of the cost of his treatment at a state-run facility.

Judge Jean Boyd, whose sentence of 10 years probation and no jail time set off a backlash of criticism in December, ordered the youth's parents to pay about $1,100 a month.

The state facility he has been sent to costs $715 a day. His parents had offered to pay for private treatment at a private out-of-state facility.

The case set off an emotional debate after a psychologist for the teenager testified that his family's wealth had impaired the teenager's ability to take responsibility for his actions, saying he suffered from "affluenza."

The American Psychiatric Association does not recognize "affluenza" as a diagnosis.

Prosecutors had asked the court to send the teenager to a youth detention center as punishment.

Prosecutors said the then 16-year-old had a blood alcohol level three times the legal limit for an adult when he killed the driver of a car that had broken down by the side of the road and three people who had gone to help the stranded motorist.

Four other people were injured, two seriously, in the crash near Fort Worth in June 2013.

(Editing by David Bailey and Ken Wills)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (28)
“Judge Jean Boyd, whose sentence of 10 years probation and no jail time set off a backlash of criticism in December, ordered the youth’s parents to pay about $1,100 a month.”

One can assume Judge Boyd herself received far in excess of that. Because no sane judge would have ruled the way she did about a murderer whose family was not paying them off.

Apr 11, 2014 8:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
GeorgeBurdell wrote:
I hope the young man gets the right kind of treatment.

Apr 11, 2014 8:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
castaway5555 wrote:
I’m still bothered by the original ruling, and having Mommy and Daddy chip in a pittance, hardly makes things better. If this boy had been any thing less than White and Wealthy in Texas, he’d be in the some mean juvenile detention center with the key thrown away. He’d be forgotten, like millions of children and young teens across the nation, whatever the crime. This boy’s crime was heinous; many more are incarcerated on lesser counts. Let justice be equal.

Apr 11, 2014 9:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.