Israel says Kerry remarks on Iran nuclear threshold 'not acceptable'

JERUSALEM Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:40am EDT

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry testifies at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee while on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 8, 2014. REUTERS/Larry Downing

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry testifies at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee while on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 8, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

Related Topics

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel described as "unacceptable" on Monday remarks by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry suggesting cautious openness to negotiating a nuclear deal that would keep Iran six to 12 months away from bomb-making capability.

"In the past, and also recently, what we heard from the Americans, including publicly, and from the Europeans and even from the Russians, was that Iran must be distanced years - not months but years - from nuclear weaponry," said Yuval Steinitz, the Israeli cabinet minister in charge of nuclear affairs.

Iran, which denies seeking nuclear arms, is in talks with Washington and five other world powers on rolling back its work on uranium enrichment and a potentially plutonium-yielding reactor.

Briefing U.S. senators last week, Kerry stopped short of saying negotiators would "settle for" a timeline of six to 12 months in which Iran could amass enough fissile material for a nuclear device but said it would be "significantly more" than the current two months it would take.

"The things that Kerry said ... are worrying. They are surprising. They are not acceptable," Steinitz told Israel Radio.

The Israelis, widely assumed to have the Middle East's sole atomic arsenal, see Tehran's nuclear program as a deadly threat and have long threatened to launch pre-emptive war against Iran if they deem international diplomacy a dead end.

The censure of Kerry's remarks follows a cascade of Israeli criticism of the U.S. statesman's mediation of peace talks with the Palestinians, which are now deadlocked.

"We will not be able to adopt and accept any agreement that keeps Iran within a range of months to a year from nuclear weaponry, because such an agreement would not hold water," Steinitz said, reiterating Israel's demand that its arch-enemy be stripped of nuclear capabilities.

"It would also prompt Iran to get nuclear weaponry, and Sunni Arab countries like Algeria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, perhaps also Turkey and the UAE, to seek to launch a nuclear arms race."

(Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Crispian Balmer and Hugh Lawson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (14)
Brainfood42 wrote:
Kerry is just milk toast. He was a weak and ineffectual candidate for president. He blew-up the ability of the US and its allies to get involved in the Syrian conflict. He makes mistakes in a game that is just too dam serious. He will continue to cause problems around the world. Get Hillary back. She has brains and we need her…the world needs her. Can we give up one Obama and one Kerry for a much better Hillary? That is a trade the world needs.

Apr 14, 2014 6:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
sumbunny wrote:
Remind me please, just what did Hillary’s brain accomplish while she was Sec of State?

Apr 14, 2014 9:07am EDT  --  Report as abuse
rgbviews wrote:
It is time for Israel to stop treating it’s neighbours as rabid dogs and to start coming up with it’s own strategies that will lead to detente and eventual acceptance in the neighbourhood. Continued promotion of hostility may keep the likes of Netanyahu in power and satisfy the age-old persecution complex, but it puts the long term survival of the State of Israel in danger.

How about starting with signing the NPT, leading a movement for a WMD-free Middle East, agreeing that international laws are to resolve the conflict with the Palestinians, recognizing the Nakba and setting up a process for reconciliation.

Obviously this cannot happen without regime change in Israel.

Apr 14, 2014 9:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.