U.S. adopts harsher tone in U.N. envoy dispute with Iran

WASHINGTON Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:05pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States adopted a harsher tone toward Iran's proposed U.N. ambassador on Tuesday, calling Tehran's choice of Hamid Abutalebi "unacceptable" and tying him to the 1979-1981 U.S. hostage crisis in Tehran.

While it did not detail what the veteran diplomat may have done during the period, when radical Iranian students seized the U.S. embassy and held 52 U.S. hostages for 444 days, the State Department for the first time linked the U.S. decision not to issue him a visa to those events.

"He himself has said he was involved and, given his role in the events of 1979, which clearly matter profoundly to the American people, it would be unacceptable for the United States to grant this visa," State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters at her daily briefing.

Abutalebi has said that he acted only as a translator.

Previously U.S. spokespeople used softer language, saying the choice was not "viable."

The United States on Friday said it had told Iran it would not give Abutalebi a visa. U.S. officials privately say they hope Iran might quietly drop the issue and name a new envoy.

However, Iran on Monday asked for a special meeting of a U.N. committee on the U.S. decision, calling it a dangerous precedent that could harm international diplomacy.

Officials, diplomats and academics could not recall past cases of the United States denying a U.N. ambassador's visa.

Under a 1947 "headquarters agreement," the United States is generally required to allow access to the United Nations for foreign diplomats. Washington says it can deny visas for "security, terrorism, and foreign policy" reasons.

U.S. officials have said they do not expect the dispute over Abutalebi to hurt negotiations between Iran and six major powers under which Iran would restrict its nuclear program in exchange for economic sanctions relief.

(Reporting By Arshad Mohammed; editing by Andrew Hay)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
WestFlorida wrote:
The person from Iran who violated every rule of diplomacy in the book by over-running the American Embassy and capturing as hostages the staff, now wishes to afford himself of the privileges of diplomatic immunity. What a joke. Keep him out, permanently. Iran has plenty of intelligent persons who can handle the job at the UN, and New York City has many good barber shops.

Apr 15, 2014 3:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Eric.Klein wrote:
Those who broke the Vienna Conventions should not expect them or similar agreements to be used in their favor.

Apr 15, 2014 3:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Speakerbliss wrote:
Guys, you forget they were students, angry at the US for overthrowing their democratic elected government and putting in place a CIA approved dictator “The Shah” who tortured and jailed any protest. All about oil.

Apr 15, 2014 5:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.