Google still a top pick for Wall Street, despite mobile ad challenges

Thu Apr 17, 2014 11:55am EDT

A Google logo is seen at the entrance to the company's offices in Toronto September 5, 2013. REUTERS/Chris Helgren

A Google logo is seen at the entrance to the company's offices in Toronto September 5, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Chris Helgren

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Google Inc's disappointing first-quarter results left Wall Street unfazed about the internet giant's ability to come to grips with the shift to the fast-growing mobile advertising market.

Google shares were down about 3 percent in early trading on Thursday, and at least 12 brokerages cut their target price on the stock. But most analysts kept a "buy" rating or equivalent on the company's shares.

"Despite an expectations-miss quarter, Google remains one of the best-positioned stocks for many of the secular growth drivers in the Internet space," RBC Capital analyst Mark Mahaney, who kept his "outperform" rating on the stock, said in a note to clients.

Of the 46 analysts covering Google, 35 have a "buy" or equivalent rating on the stock. Nobody has a "sell".

Google, Facebook Inc and Twitter Inc are revamping their products and advertising business to try to take advantage of a global shift to mobile phones and tablets.

For investors in Google, accustomed to the company enjoying one of the highest ad margins in the business, mobile ads have translated to a steep drop in ad rates.

Advertising rates on mobile phones are typically cheaper than traditional online ads because of their smaller screens. But mobile advertising continues to make up a bigger slice of the revenue of Internet companies.

Google company reported a 26 percent increase in paid clicks volumes but the average cost-per-click declined 9 percent.

"Google remains a core internet holding and we reiterate our "overweight" rating," Morgan Stanley said in a note titled "Keep calm and search on".

Analysts highlighted core revenue growth from Google websites and YouTube, higher contribution from rest-of-world revenue, strong sales of digital apps and content in Google's Play Store and Chromecast TV dongles.

Many also expect Google's Enhanced Campaigns advertisement program and other ad products to improve monetization from mobile and noted management's view that location and other data would help mobile pricing over time.

"We continue to recommend GOOGL due to the strength of the core search business, continued product innovation, and improving monetization, which should allow GOOGL to take a growing share of the desktop and mobile online ad markets," Susquehanna analyst Brian Nowak said.

Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster also remained upbeat.

"We continue to view Google as the best long term large cap story in our coverage space given the company's focus on innovation," he said.

However, Goldman Sachs, which has a "neutral" rating on Google's shares, said it expected the stock to remain range-bound in the near-term as the market waits for mobile cost-per-click rates to improve.

Google shares were trading at $545.22 shortly after the opening on the Nasdaq after closing at $563.90 on Wednesday.

(Additional reporting by Soham Chatterjee; Editing by Saumyadeb Chakrabarty and Ted Kerr)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
SanPa wrote:
Google is about to fall … their search dominance is about to be crushed.

Apr 17, 2014 12:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Yes, Google is still touted by the analysts despite the disappointing quarter. But who are these analysts? The ones who were wrong about the quarter!

People will come to realize that “Googling” something doesn’t give them necessarily what they’re looking for but what Google and its advertisers want them to see. Also, often the first result is a reference to Wikipedia – suggesting that that’s the site to have gone to in the first place!

As for the 5,000,000 other results from the search? An absurdity!

Apr 17, 2014 2:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Lol, I never, ever respond to ads, whether they’re on my TV, my phone, in my mailbox, or on my computer.

As far as I’m concerned, they’re all invasive and unwanted. I’m a grown man, I know what I like, I know how to shop, and I know how to filter Google results so I find what I want to find, not what someone else wants me to see.

And Google, if you’re reading this, tailoring ads for people like me is a waste of your time and money, since I go out of my way to resist such efforts.

Apr 17, 2014 8:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.