Two justices say high court will likely rule on NSA programs

WASHINGTON Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:48pm EDT

A National Security Agency (NSA) data gathering facility is seen in Bluffdale, about 25 miles (40 kms) south of Salt Lake City, Utah, December 17, 2013. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart

A National Security Agency (NSA) data gathering facility is seen in Bluffdale, about 25 miles (40 kms) south of Salt Lake City, Utah, December 17, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Urquhart

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two members of the Supreme Court indicated on Thursday night that the court will ultimately have to decide the legality of National Security Agency surveillance activities.

The two justices, Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, made the comments during a public event at the National Press Club in Washington. They were responding to questions posed by journalist Marvin Kalb about whether the court would take up cases arising from the recent disclosures about NSA surveillance, most notably by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

The justices did not discuss specific NSA programs. There are various lawsuits pending around the country challenging the government's widespread collection of telephone records. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled in December that the program was probably unlawful, while a judge in New York held later that month that it was not. Both cases are now on appeal.

Scalia, a leading conservative justice, said the court was not the best body to decide major national security issues because of its lack of expertise. But he indicated that the court would likely decide the issue of whether widespread gathering of telecommunications data violates the Fourth Amendment, which bars unlawful searches and seizures.

"The institution that will decide that is the institution least qualified to decide it," Scalia said. The legal question is about "balancing the emergency against the intrusion" on the individual, he said.

Nine justices serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Ginsburg, one of the court's liberal members, said the justices would have little choice but to decide the matter should it come before them.

"We can't run away and say, 'Well, we don't know much about that subject so we won't decide it,'" she said.

(Editing by Jan Paschal)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (7)
JoeSchmoe123 wrote:
The Constitution doesn’t say 4th amendment is context-sensitive, ala “balancing the emergency against the intrusion”. In addition, NSA lied under oath to Congress and that needs to be taken into consideration as well.
I’m not a lawyer but am pretty sure it’s against the law to repeatedly lie to Congress.

Apr 17, 2014 10:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
euro-yank wrote:
For the court who decided that corporations are people, I’m sure it’ll be a walk in the park to decide that spying is freedom.

Apr 17, 2014 12:38am EDT  --  Report as abuse
UScitizentoo wrote:
> high court will likely rule on NSA programs
Yea like that gives all US citizens confidence. Along with the corporations are people decision, the US Supreme Court serves it’s corporate masters just like the rest of the fascist U S government. Of course it is legal to protect the welfare of the corporations, spying helps keep the laws protecting corporations enforced.
Notice that through the gridlock of Washington the tax break extension for corporations was passed unanimously? Walmart is your elected representative, call them when you need some political favors they can arrange it for you.

Apr 18, 2014 2:15am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.