GM could benefit, too, from an ignition-switch victims fund

Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:03am EDT

A man walks past a row of General Motors vehicles at a Chevrolet dealership on Woodward Avenue in Detroit, Michigan April 1, 2014. REUTERS/Rebecca Cook

A man walks past a row of General Motors vehicles at a Chevrolet dealership on Woodward Avenue in Detroit, Michigan April 1, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Rebecca Cook

Related Topics

(Reuters) - If General Motors Co creates a fund to compensate victims of its faulty ignition switches, an option that a top legal adviser suggested it is exploring, the company could give up strong defenses to a wave of lawsuits. But it could stand to gain even more.

By setting up a fund, GM could avert years of civil litigation and limit its financial and reputational harm.

GM has retained Kenneth Feinberg, a Washington lawyer who has overseen compensation funds for victims of high-profile catastrophes like the BP Plc oil spill and the September 11, 2001, attacks.

Feinberg told CNBC on Wednesday that GM is "asking me to help develop some sort of program that might be used to compensate eligible claimants."

Feinberg did not return a request for comment. A spokesman for GM, Jim Cain, said Feinberg is "highly respected for his handling of compensation issues, and we've hired him to explore and evaluate all options." That work is ongoing, and no decisions have been made, Cain said.

GM has been hit with dozens of lawsuits since it began its recall over the ignition switch in February, which has now encompassed 2.6 million vehicles. The cases have been brought on behalf of individuals injured or killed in accidents involving recalled vehicles, as well as by customers who say they suffered economic losses like lower resale value. They claim GM hid knowledge of switch problems for more than a decade.

GM has at least two strong defenses to those suits. One is that so-called New GM, the company that emerged from bankruptcy in 2009, can't be held responsible for the actions of Old GM, which is a separate legal entity. Most of the vehicles with faulty ignition switches were produced before the bankruptcy.

GM made this argument recently in motions filed in federal courts in San Francisco and Corpus Christi, Texas. The company asked to put those cases on hold, saying it intends to ask a bankruptcy court in New York to decide whether such claims are barred against the current company.

Another potentially strong shield for GM, legal experts said, is the statute of limitations, which sets a deadline for filing certain lawsuits. Those limits vary by state, but lawsuits over accidents more than two or three years old may encounter that barrier.


A victims' compensation fund typically requires claimants to waive their right to sue and give up the chance to pursue punitive damages, a type of award not linked to an actual injury but designed to punish companies.

Such waivers would protect the company from having to reveal potentially damaging details about its actions and face juries that could award victims huge sums in punitive damages.

A fund would not, however, shield the company from government probes and potential criminal prosecution. GM is under investigation by federal prosecutors, regulators and Congress. The company is also conducting an internal probe.

But funds are generally voluntary, and claimants can't be forced to sign on, a problem BP confronted. While its fund processed more than 1 million claims and paid out more than $6.2 billion, it was still hit with hundreds of lawsuits from those who were either ineligible or unwilling for the fund.

Compensation programs come in many forms and can be set up in a variety of ways. Congress created the fund for victims of the September 11 attacks, and the White House worked with BP on its compensation system. A company could also act on its own to set up a fund.

There's another option - working with the U.S. Department of Justice.

U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, suggested that path on Wednesday, saying that GM should agree to make victim restitution a part of any resolution to the ongoing criminal investigation.

That could be GM's best option, as working together with federal prosecutors may help allay criticism that it is acting in its own self-interest, said Adam Zimmerman, a professor at Loyola Law School and tort law expert who worked on the September 11 fund. While fairly unusual, such an agreement would give GM, and victims, "more legal certainty and justice than its own fund."

(Reporting by Jessica Dye, editing by Amy Stevens)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
GaryDmn wrote:
They should have gone bankrupt, but the Obama administration and the Democrats had to save the unions, who financially and physically support their election campaigns. To save them, they has to trample over existing laws, like the contract rights of bond holders and anyone that borrowed money to GM, to benefit the unions. Then GM was controlled by the government and the unions, who both have a terrible record of mismanagement and never being held accountable.

Apr 18, 2014 11:32am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Swisswatch wrote:
GaryDMn – Think TARP, 2008, Bush.

Good ol’ Gm, another “person” attempting to ooze its way out of any liability after doing wrong. The sad thing is “he/her” will pretty much succeed.

Apr 18, 2014 12:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
josmarten wrote:
Jessica, good information, thanks ! But since Wagoner was the CEO and chairman of GM from 2000 to 2008 , why not ask him ? and why the Senate and House went after Barra instead ? She got nothing to do with this 2001 to 2005 disaster decisions , so why not go after Wagoner and his Board of Directors ? like the Hedge Funds that destroyed GM ( with some of the Unions executives ) with massive stock options, fees, salaries,perks, buy-outs and specially the massive loans they took to feed the banksters ?

Apr 18, 2014 1:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.