Idaho veteran denied burial site for lesbian spouse offered plot by fellow vet

SALMON, Idaho Thu May 1, 2014 12:57am EDT

Related Topics

SALMON, Idaho (Reuters) - A retired U.S. Army colonel on Wednesday offered up his burial plot in the Idaho State Veterans Cemetery to a veteran barred by state marriage laws and military rules from interring her ashes and those of her dead lesbian spouse.

The push by U.S. Navy veteran Madelynn Taylor and a woman she married out-of-state comes as four Idaho lesbian couples are challenging the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and a broader debate over gay nuptials nationwide.

Taylor told a Boise TV station the state military cemetery denied the pair burial as they did not have the Idaho marriage license required under its rules. Her longtime lesbian partner, Jean Mixner, died in 2012.

"I am happy to give my fellow veteran that small peace of mind," retired U.S. Army Colonel Barry Johnson, a 27-year veteran, wrote in an open letter published on Wednesday in the Idaho Statesman newspaper. "And I do it to honor all the great Americans I've served with along the way - gay, straight, whatever."

It was unclear if the cemetery would allow the transfer. The Idaho Division of Veterans Services said the cemetery's policy remains unchanged.

Taylor was undergoing surgery at a veterans hospital in Seattle on Wednesday and could not be reached for comment.

Earlier this month, Taylor told KBOI, the Boise TV station, that she was not surprised the Western state moved to bar the couple's burial. She described the policy as yet another act of discrimination "in death as well as life."

"I don't see where the ashes of a couple of old lesbians are going to hurt anybody," she said.

Idaho's Republican Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter said in a statement that voters in the state spoke in 2006 by approving a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

(Reporting by Laura Zuckerman in Salmon, Idaho; Editing by Eric M. Johnson and; Edwina Gibbs)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
WmColbn wrote:
In other words, the anti-gay movement is not really based on any supposedly legitimate fears, such as that gays will molest their children. What is there to fear from ashes? Obviously this is only a religiously based movement against gays without any basis in science.

May 01, 2014 10:29am EDT  --  Report as abuse
lemonfemale wrote:
Well, I won’t blame the cemetery for following the rules. Bless the veteran who offered his own plot. I wonder though whether both ladies could not be buried in one plot. Ashes don’t take as much space as would a casket. That way, no matter what the marriage law in Idaho is at the time of her death, the ladies would be buried together.

May 01, 2014 12:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Earl_Wutt wrote:
Thank you Colonel Johnson!

May 01, 2014 3:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.