Google faces antitrust lawsuit on U.S. mobile internet search

Fri May 2, 2014 6:31am EDT

A posed picture shows a phone displaying the Google search page in New York August 15, 2011. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

A posed picture shows a phone displaying the Google search page in New York August 15, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Consumer rights law firm Hagens Berman said it filed a nationwide antitrust class-action lawsuit against Google Inc alleging the company "illegally monopolized" the Internet and mobile search market in the United States.

The lawsuit alleges that Google has expanded its monopoly of the internet search market by pre-loading its applications onto Android mobile devices through its Mobile Application Distribution Agreements.

According to the lawsuit, Google's role in placing this suite of apps, including Google Play and YouTube, has hampered the market and kept the price of devices made by competing manufactures like Samsung Electronics and HTC Corp artificially high.

Google said Android and Google can be used independent of each other.

"Anyone can use Android without Google and anyone can use Google without Android. Since Android's introduction, greater competition in smartphones has given consumers more choices at lower prices," Matt Kallman, a Google spokesman, told Reuters.

Steve Berman, the attorney representing consumers, alleged that Google had not achieved its monopoly by offering a better search engine, but through anti-competitive placement and market manipulation.

The case is in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, 5:14-cv-02007-HRL.

(Reporting by Arnab Sen in Bangalore; Editing by Gopakumar Warrier)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
wims80 wrote:
“Steve Berman, the attorney representing consumers.”
Exactly who are these consumers? It wouldn’t happen to be Apple, would it?

May 02, 2014 1:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
wims80 wrote:
“Steve Berman, the attorney representing consumers.”
Exactly who are these consumers? It wouldn’t happen to be Apple, would it?

May 02, 2014 1:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
enoctis wrote:
People just suing for money; it’s a sad world in which we live.

May 02, 2014 5:18am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.