UPDATE 2-NATO: Russia might achieve goals in eastern Ukraine without invasion

Mon May 5, 2014 7:39pm EDT

Related Topics

(Adds comments from commander, Harper; implications for NATO spending)

By Randall Palmer

OTTAWA May 5 (Reuters) - NATO's top military commander in Europe said on Monday he no longer thought regular Russian troops would enter eastern Ukraine, predicting Moscow could achieve its goals through the unconventional forces stirring up trouble there.

U.S. Air Force General Philip Breedlove said it was a completely false Russian narrative that it was only Ukrainians rebelling in the east of their country, saying it was clear that special forces troops from Russia were operating there as they did in Crimea before its annexation.

"Remember that (Russian President Vladimir) Putin denied their presence and now he has admitted to their presence in Crimea. The same thing will come out of Ukraine as time rolls out," he told a military and diplomatic audience in Ottawa.

"Exactly what we saw in Crimea is being mirrored in eastern Ukraine," added Breedlove.

Russia has massed tens of thousands of troops on its border with eastern Ukraine, prompting fears that Moscow might send ground forces in to protect the rights of ethnic Russians.

Breedlove said that until a week ago, he thought the most likely military response from Russia would be to send in troops to southern Ukraine and secure a land bridge to the peninsula of Crimea - which voted in March to join Russia - before possibly pushing on toward the Black Sea port of Odessa and then further west toward Moldova.

"Today I would tell you I don't think that's the most likely course of action ... I think now that Putin may be able to accomplish his objectives in eastern Ukraine and never go across the border with his forces," he said.

"Now I think probably the most likely course of action is that he will continue doing what he's doing - discrediting the government, creating unrest, trying to set the stage for a separatist movement," and that would make it easier to cement Moscow's military and economic hold on eastern Ukraine, Breedlove added.

"In that case, I think it's the most troublesome for NATO because if the forces do not come across the border, my guess is that many will want to try to quickly go back to business as usual, and I, for one, do not believe annexing Crimea is business as usual."

Shortly before his public remarks, Breedlove discussed Ukraine and Russia in a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who told reporters beforehand that the escalation of violence in Ukraine appeared clearly to be "a slow-motion invasion on the part of the Putin regime."

Breedlove did not go as far as to say whether operatives from Russia had fired the missiles that have been downing Ukrainian helicopters. At least three helicopters have been shot down in the last week.

It also appeared that some missiles have gone missing from a local Ukrainian weapons storage depot, so he said he would not jump to the conclusion that it was direct Russian involvement, but he would not preclude it either.

More broadly in terms of NATO policy, he said, Russia's actions in Ukraine had demonstrated that it was not acting like a partner, and this should prompt more members of the NATO alliance to boost their defense spending toward the agreed target of 2 percent of gross domestic product.

"We have come from a period where we saw Russia as a partner," he said. "We are now in a very, very different time, and I think individual nations need to take this aboard and consider." (Additional reporting by David Ljunggren; editing by G Crosse; and Diane Craft)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
ruffsoft wrote:
CIA has been in Ukraine for a decade. Last week, CIA director visited the Junta in Kiev.

IF Russia has special forces in eastern Ukraine, it is right on their border, with an illegal coup regime in charge of the central government. US spent 5 billion to overthrow elected government, and CIA is in Ukraine, ALSO on Russian border.

What if Russian special forces were on border in Mexico?
What if fascists violently overthrew US government, claiming it was corrupt?

What if the fascists inspire fascists throughout Europe and the world? Neo-nazis are emboldened with their first real govt power since Spain 35 years ago? What if the American far right neo-Nazis (ie the white power movement, the militia movement, and the anti-immigrant movement) take US support of fascism in Ukraine as a sign
that it’s time to emerge into national politics as a real force?

What if US subversion of Ukraine democracy starts a civil war that, as in Aghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria goes on and on with more and more death and destruction. Hey, it’s a good business model for those who profit from war: the banks, energy, and the weapons makers.

And a nation at war with itself is in no position to exert any power against those who wish to control it, such as the IMF, NATO, etc.

It’s a sad day when Russian propaganda has much more truth than Western propaganda. Yesterday the media was full of stories in which the fire that killed 40 anti-Kiev activists was described as having started itself, or perhaps the activists tried to incinerate themselves. “We will never know.”

Fukka mon! We know. And where is the condemnation? Has the Western media lost all decency?

May 05, 2014 11:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.