Accused Boston bomber's lawyers seek privacy for family meetings

BOSTON Tue May 6, 2014 9:52am EDT

Related Topics

BOSTON (Reuters) - Defense attorneys for accused Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev called on a federal judge late Monday to block law enforcement agents from monitoring jailhouse meetings between the suspect, his attorneys and his sisters.

Attorneys for Tsarnaev, who could be executed if convicted of killing three people and injuring 264 in the 2013 attack, argued there was no proof to support prosecutors' concerns that his sisters may be using "terrorist tradecraft" to pass messages to the surviving bomber.

"Raising such paper-thin concerns about security is a no-lose proposition for the government, because even the flimsiest of arguments, once ominously repeated and amplified by the news media, will inevitably tend to inflame the public's fear of the defendant," attorneys for the 20-year old ethnic Chechen said in a filing in U.S. District Court in Boston.

Defense attorneys are seeking to build a case that their client, the younger of the two brothers - who prosecutors say placed homemade pressure-cooker bombs at the race's crowded finish line and, three days later, shot dead a university police officer as they tried to flee the city - was less culpable than 26-year-old Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

The older sibling was killed after an exchange of gunfire with police during the brothers' attempt to escape.

The defense attorneys have argued that unmonitored meetings between the surviving Tsarnaev, his sisters and attorneys, would allow them to build a more comprehensive picture of his family dynamics. The assignment of a federal agent involved with the prosecution to monitor those meetings, they say, would interfere with their ability to develop that picture.

Prosecutors, who contend that Tsarnaev carried out the largest mass-casualty attack on U.S. soil since September 11, 2001, contend that failing to monitor those meetings would allow Tsarnaev's sisters to pass coded information to him.

"Only real time monitoring of social visitors' conversations with Tsarnaev by someone familiar generally with terrorist tradecraft and specifically with the facts of this case can ensure that those conversations are not being used as a vehicle to convey forbidding messages," they argued in a prior court filing.

(Reporting by Scott Malone; Editing by Bernadette Baum)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
REnninga wrote:
Oh, by all means let’s coddle this murderer.

I suspect those who lost family members to this monster and his brother would enjoy “private’ conversations with their loved ones, too. But he killed their loved ones, didn’t he?.

I suspect those who were horribly maimed, and lost limbs would enjoy “privacy”, rather than the curious stares of strangers, for the rest of their lives. But he denied them that, didn’t he?

Maybe he can be granted a few “private” minutes of conversation with his family members, just before he draws his last breath. That would be more than fair. After all, that’s more than he granted his victims, right?

May 06, 2014 2:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.