U.S. House votes Benghazi panel, Democrats consider boycott

WASHINGTON Thu May 8, 2014 7:34pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Republican-run U.S. House of Representatives voted along party lines on Thursday to set up a committee to investigate the 2012 attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya. Unhappy Democrats were considering boycotting the panel.

The House voted 232-186 to set up a 12-member special investigative committee. It is expected to be chaired by South Carolina Republican Trey Gowdy and include seven Republicans and five Democrats.

Democrats had sought an evenly divided panel, but Republicans prevailed with the argument that they should have a majority on the committee because they were elected to majority status in the House.

Armed militants attacked U.S. diplomatic posts in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, killing U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

Republicans accuse the administration of doing too little to repulse the attacks and later creating a smokescreen around the events to protect President Barack Obama's image as tough on terrorism and help boost his re-election chances in November 2012.

Although there have been numerous investigations by congressional committees and a State Department "Accountability Review Board," Republicans say the Obama administration has not provided all the relevant information about the reasons for the attacks and how the administration responded to them.

"Our committees sought the full truth and the administration tried to make sure they wouldn't find it," House Speaker John Boehner told lawmakers before Thursday's vote. "Which meant they tried to prevent the American people from finding the truth as well."

Democrats say Republicans are continuing to focus on the Benghazi attacks for political reasons, especially to harm the reputation of Hillary Clinton, a potential 2016 Democratic presidential candidate who was secretary of state at the time of the Benghazi attacks.

"One more committee weighted in favor of the majority is not going to do any better. We have bottomed out on Benghazi," said Representative Louise Slaughter of New York.

She expressed outrage that some Republicans were using Benghazi to raise campaign funds: "Have you no shame?"

Democrats said they were undecided on whether to take part in the panel so long as the ratio of Democrats to Republicans is not even. Representative Chris Van Hollen of Maryland said Democrats had made some proposals to Boehner's office for other ways to ensure fairness in the committee.

"We've suggested if you don't have even numbers, you could still ensure bipartisan support for subpoenas and other informational requests," Van Hollen said.

Representative John Lewis Of Georgia said: "We're still debating, but I lean toward participating. We should be at the table. We should be in the room."

Representative Adam Schiff of California, however, said, "I don't think we should" participate.

The resolution said the committee would investigate "all policies, decisions an activities that contributed to the attacks on United States facilities in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012, as well as those that affected the ability of the United States to prepare for the attacks."

The panel would also probe the response, as well as internal administration communications about the attacks, the resolution said.

Seven Democrats voted for the formation of the committee, and no Republican voted against it.

(Reporting by Susan Cornwell; Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (19)
carnivalchaos wrote:
What are Republicans offering as a solution to the issues facing Americans? The Republicans are utterly bankrupt of any ideas. All they have is obstruction, personal attacks, tax cuts for the rich, deregulations for the rich, abuse of our Constitution, and trumped up issues like Benghazi. They no longer serve the American people. They serve themselves and the very rich.

Proof? Look at the issue of gun control. 90% of Americans want universal background checks, yet the Republican Congress refuses to give the American people what they ask for. This is supposed to be a Republic, a democracy by Representation, but thanks to the Republicans the American people aren’t being represented.

Healthcare is another example. During the 2008 Presidential election healthcare was often cited as the #1 issues most Americans were concerned about, yet Republicans did everything they could to prevent healthcare reform.

Another example is the Keystone pipeline. It does nothing that benefits the American public, yet we shoulder all the risk. There’s no good reason to allow the pipeline to run through the US. The Republicans support it because the Koch brothers want it. They’ll make money off of it, just like many of the Republican donors who wanted war with Iraq so they can increase their profits, like Halliburton, the company Dick Cheney was CEO of. This has to stop. The Republicans have become the enemy of the people.

May 08, 2014 8:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
4825 wrote:
Democrats are considering boycotting. So what else is new. They have boycotted the country over the past few years. The democrats are the party of division so why should they change now. Vote every democrat from office every chance you get, I am.

May 08, 2014 8:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
carnivalchaos wrote:
4825: You’re a paid poster whose posts are so insipid they do more harm to the conservatives than any benefit. The Democrats have done plenty. Obviously, it’s the Republicans who have “boycotted” our country, or more specifically, boycotted the governing of our country. I ask you again, what have the Republicans done lately for the American people? What did they do for healthcare? What have they done for immigration reform? What have they done to pass a jobs bill? What have they done to improve education? What have they done to protect our privacy? What have they done to lower the cost of living? What have they done to increase minimum wage? What have they done to lower the cost of higher education? What have they done to protect our environment and reverse climate change? What have they done to pass universal background checks for gun purchases, something 90% of the US public is in favor of? They’ve done nothing. They don’t govern. They only serve the very rich. And by the very rich, I mean multi-millionaires and billionaires, those who pay the GOP for their services.

May 08, 2014 9:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.