No workers have died on World Cup projects, says Qatar

SWEIMEH Jordan Tue May 13, 2014 12:13pm EDT

Related Topics

SWEIMEH Jordan (Reuters) - No construction workers have been killed working on a 2022 World Cup project site, Nasser Al Khater, the media and marketing director of the Qatar organizing committee, said on Tuesday.

Reports of the deaths of immigrant workers in the Gulf State have made global headlines for the last year since a report in Britain's Guardian newspaper, but Al Khater, delivering an update on progress for the finals in eight years' time, sought to put the figures into perspective.

Speaking to delegates at the Soccerex Asian Forum by the banks of the Dead Sea, Al Khater addressed the issues of workers rights under the kafala (tied employment) system used in the country.

"Contrary to what the international media says there has not been a single injury or death on the World Cup projects," he said.

"It's not possible to have 400 deaths when you are still digging a hole in the ground so I would like to make sure this matter is put to rest.

"However, we have taken the issue of workers welfare very seriously and made sure that the highest standards in terms of workers welfare are stated in all our contracts.

"We have always said the World Cup is a catalyst for change and we welcome the spotlight this issue has brought."

Hundreds of construction workers have died in Qatar on non-World Cup projects, but moves are underway to implement major safety changes throughout the country's construction industry.

Al Khater said that only one World Cup stadium was currently under construction and that five would get under way by the end of this year.

He said that "important announcements" would soon be made on the issue of workers' welfare, adding that no firm decisions had yet been made over cutting the number of World Cup stadiums from 12 to eight.

He said this decision would be taken next year and hinted that due to the size of the country, only eight might be used and not 12.

FIFA's rules are that eight is the minimum number for a World Cup.

"There has been a lot of speculation that Qatar has minimized the number of stadiums and some have said it's because of budget cuts," Al Khater said. "That’s not true.

"Given the size of the country, while we propose 12 stadiums, eight are in final preparation. Of those eight, five will be in different phases of construction by end of this year, with the remaining three announced after 2014.

"Then, in 2015 we will decide alongside FIFA how many stadia Qatar really needs.

"We will make sure that the World Cup will represent the Middle East - and that when we welcome the fans they get a taste of the culture and understand that the Middle East is not what is being perceived right now."


(Editing by Ed Osmond)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
cmart102 wrote:
It’s downright criminal that Qatar still has their WC bid.

May 14, 2014 8:57am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ndluli wrote:
Qatar’s promise to reform its Labor Laws, is a rehash of the old one, and actually seems even stricter. If your contract is not for a fixed period – you are stuck for a minimum of five years. Expats will still require exit permits and will still need their employers blessing to leave the country. Just the same idea described differently. Qatar should be given an ultimatum: either make genuine efforts to reform your labor laws, following the DLA Piper recommendations in full, or the WC will be staged elsewhere. They should be given a target date to comply. For most expats in Qatar, this new Labor Law concept is meaningless rhetoric designed to say what the international community wants to hear. But in reality it’s nothing of substance.

May 15, 2014 10:12am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.