Time to stop defense cuts, NATO tells East Europeans

BRATISLAVA Thu May 15, 2014 8:53am EDT

Paratroopers from the U.S. Army's 173rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team participate in training exercises with the Polish 6 Airborne Brigade soldiers at the Land Forces Training Centre in Oleszno near Drawsko Pomorskie, north west Poland, May 1, 2014. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel

Paratroopers from the U.S. Army's 173rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team participate in training exercises with the Polish 6 Airborne Brigade soldiers at the Land Forces Training Centre in Oleszno near Drawsko Pomorskie, north west Poland, May 1, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Kacper Pempel

Related Topics

BRATISLAVA (Reuters) - NATO members in Central and Eastern Europe need to beef up defense spending after cutting it for the past five years while Russia has sharply increased its military budget, the head of the Western alliance said on Thursday.

NATO and its leading power, the United States, have long been urging reluctant members to spend more, but the issue has taken on new significance since Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean peninsula in March.

"Russian defense spending has grown by more than 10 percent in real terms each year over the past five years," NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told a security conference in Slovakia, one of four alliance members - with Poland, Hungary and Romania - that share a border with Ukraine.

"By contrast, several European NATO countries have cut their defense spending by more than 20 percent over the same period.

"And the cuts have been particularly deep here in central and eastern Europe. This is unsustainable. Now is the time to stop the cuts and start reversing the trend."

Rasmussen said Russia had not met the commitments it made at a meeting in Geneva last month to help defuse the crisis in Ukraine, where pro-Russian separatist militants have taken over parts of the south and east.

"Judging by Russia's actions, the aim is clear. Russia is trying to establish a new sphere of influence in defiance of international law and fundamental agreements that Russia itself has signed," he said.

"This has profound long-term implications for our security and it requires serious long-term solutions."

Russia says the pro-Western Ukrainian government should be using dialogue, not military force, to resolve the crisis, and assets the right to intervene in its neighbor if necessary to protect the rights of Russian-speakers.


The flare-up of Cold War-style tensions has alarmed countries in Central and Eastern Europe that only emerged from decades of domination by Moscow when they threw off Communism in 1989.

But speeches by regional prime ministers at the same Bratislava conference made clear that Rasmussen has his work cut out to persuade them to find more cash.

"Let me put it very frankly: In Slovakia, I cannot imagine in the following years any scope to increase defense spending,"

Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico said earlier.

Czech Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka said his government would look to stop a spending decline in its 2015 budget but saw no significant increases.

The Slovaks and Czechs each spent around 1 percent of gross domestic product on defense last year, down about half a percentage point since 2009, according to NATO statistics.

Poland was the closest to the goal of 2 percent that NATO sets as a target for its members. It spent 1.8 percent of GDP, and has expressed a willingness to increase that.

Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk told the conference NATO needed to have a larger presence in eastern Europe in light of the crisis in Ukraine.

NATO is already bolstering the security of eastern members with more ships, troops and troops. Its top military commander said earlier this month that the alliance would have to consider permanently stationing troops in parts of eastern Europe.

(Writing by Jason Hovet; Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
tbird7553 wrote:
Maybe membership in NATO should be based on willingness to spend 2% of GDP on defense! They would have to choose between Russian domination or Western assistance. We could only hope they would wisely choose the latter.

May 15, 2014 9:07am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Radek.kow1 wrote:
Maybe you don’t know geography of the region that well, but Czech Republic and Slovakia cannot really be invaded by Russia before Poland would get invaded. That’s why Slovakia and Czech Republic are not so willing to spend money on the army. They can just sit and wait for Poland and/or Ukraine to buy more and better guns and defend them by default. The Baltic countries are also more insecure now so they do their best to upgrade their military. Unfortunately, the article above doesn’t highlight the geography factor that much.

Besides, look at Switzerland or Luxembourg – they have virtually no serious army. They don’t wish to spend on it and they don’t have to.

May 15, 2014 4:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Radek.kow1 wrote:
The Russian army has to defend a huge swathe of territory, also from the side of China whose army spending grows faster than that of Russia. Moreover, Russian army is hugely corrupt, with a much higher % of the money going into real estate purchases than in other armies in the region, for example. The disparity in the quality of military hardware and manpower does not guarantee Russia a firm upper hand, still.

May 15, 2014 4:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.