Unhealthy food taxes vital to fight obesity: U.N. investigator

GENEVA Mon May 19, 2014 11:43am EDT

A boy holds a hamburger made with a doughnut bun at the Los Angeles County Fair in Pomona, California September 4, 2013. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

A boy holds a hamburger made with a doughnut bun at the Los Angeles County Fair in Pomona, California September 4, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Lucy Nicholson

Related Topics

GENEVA (Reuters) - Unhealthy diets pose a greater risk to global health than the increasingly regulated sale of tobacco and governments should move fast to tax harmful food products, a United Nations investigator said on Monday.

In a statement issued on the opening of the annual summit of the World Health Organisation (WHO), Belgian professor Olivier de Schutter called for efforts to launch negotiations on a global pact to tackle the obesity epidemic.

"Unhealthy diets are now a greater threat to global health than tobacco. Just as the world came together to regulate the risks of tobacco, a bold framework convention on adequate diets must now be agreed," he said.

De Schutter, who has held his post of special rapporteur on the right to food since 2008 and earlier headed the Paris-based International Federation of Human Rights, reports to the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva.

In 2005, a U.N. convention on tobacco control aimed at reducing deaths and health problems caused by the product went into force after long negotiations under the umbrella of the WHO.

In a report to the rights council in 2012, de Schutter said a similar accord on food should include taxing unhealthy products, regulating food high in saturated fats, salt and sugar, and "cracking down on junk food advertising."

That report also called for an overhaul on the system of farm subsidies "that make certain ingredients cheaper than others", and for support for local production "so that consumers have access to healthy, fresh and nutritious foods."

In his Monday statement, issued through the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, de Schutter said any attempts to promote better diets and combat obesity "will only work if the food systems underpinning them are put right.

"Governments have been focusing on increasing calories availability, but they have often been indifferent to what kind of calories are on offer, at what price, to whom they are made available, and how they are marketed."

Such measures, he declared, "are essential to ensure that people are protected from aggressive misinformation campaigns."

(Reported by Robert Evans; Editing by Toby Chopra)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (22)
Bluzpower wrote:
Its about time, The Food Industry is behaving just like Tobacco Companies in the latter half of last century. Why don’t they admit the mistakes and pledge to make it better. Right now it is a Cat & Mouse game with them trying to put one over on us by saturating everything we eat in Sugar and even more addictive Franken Wheat products. Remember when Tobacco companies had labs in Mexico to produce more addictive Nicotine. I do. Problem is they are sowing their GMO poison right here in the cornfields of Iowa and Missouri.

May 19, 2014 10:14am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Thinks4Self wrote:
Colorado is one of the leanest if not the leanest state in the US and we do not sin tax food. There is more to the obesity problem that what is being eaten.

May 19, 2014 10:30am EDT  --  Report as abuse
commenter1223 wrote:
I just hope that evil orange juice, that has at least the same if not more sugar than Coca Cola, is taxed out of existence for being unhealthy.

May 19, 2014 10:31am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.