U.S. rejects challenge to $13 billion JPMorgan Chase settlement

Tue May 20, 2014 12:55pm EDT

A sign outside the headquarters of JP Morgan Chase & Co in New York, September 19, 2013. REUTERS/Mike Segar

A sign outside the headquarters of JP Morgan Chase & Co in New York, September 19, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

(Reuters) - The U.S. government urged a federal judge to throw out a lawsuit seeking to scuttle its landmark $13 billion settlement with JPMorgan Chase & Co, rejecting a claim that the accord let the largest U.S. bank off too easily.

Better Markets Inc, a nonprofit critical of Wall Street, had in February accused the government of "unilaterally" engineering a backroom accord giving JPMorgan "blanket civil immunity" for selling shoddy mortgage securities before the financial crisis.

It said this violated the constitutional separation of powers and called for a judge to review the November settlement.

The accord included a $2 billion fine payable to the U.S. Department of Justice. The Better Markets case was prompted by the department's decision not to make its accusations public in a lawsuit before settling with JPMorgan.

In a court filing on Monday night, however, the Justice Department said its decision to settle was "presumptively" unreviewable, and that Better Markets lacked standing to sue.

The department also rejected Better Markets' suggestion that it had "abdicated" its law enforcement duties by not driving a harder bargain with JPMorgan and chief executive Jamie Dimon.

It noted that the civil settlement was the largest in U.S. history, dwarfing the $3 billion that JPMorgan once proposed, and that reopening it could take billions of dollars from people it was meant to help: troubled homeowners.

The Justice Department's power "to settle claims of the United States is undiminished, and that includes 'the power to make erroneous decisions as well as correct ones,'" the department said, citing a 1928 U.S. Supreme Court decision.

"Plaintiff's claim that DOJ's decision to settle was arbitrary and capricious, or an abuse of discretion, must ... fail," it added.

Dennis Kelleher, chief executive of Better Markets, in a statement said the filing "doubles down on secrecy" by concealing the "full truth" of JPMorgan's wrongful activity.

"The executive branch through DOJ simply cannot, on its own and without any review or approval by anyone, including the courts, cut such an historic deal and leave the American public in the dark," Kelleher said.

The JPMorgan accord earmarked $4 billion for homeowners harmed by the New York-based bank and two others it had bought, Bear Stearns Cos and Washington Mutual Inc, and $9 billion to resolve federal and state claims.

Justice Department officials have also held talks with Bank of America Corp, the No. 2 bank in the United States, to settle claims over that lender's sale of mortgage securities, people familiar with the matter have said.

On Monday, Credit Suisse Group AG became the largest bank in two decades to plead guilty to a U.S. criminal charge, admitting to conspiring to aid tax evasion and agreeing to pay $2.6 billion in penalties.

The case is Better Markets Inc v. U.S. Department of Justice et al, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No. 14-00190.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Additional reporting by Aruna Viswanatha in Washington, D.C.; Editing by Grant McCool)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
beofaction wrote:
The folks at Better Markets, Inc. either have no conscience or are ignorant – or maybe both. To perpetuate the myth that it was lenders that caused the mortgage debacle is disgraceful. “Watchdogs” my foot. The government DICTATES lending criteria. They purposely relaxed lending standards to increase home ownership (conveniently, no one remembers the public grandstanding about this by Schumer and Frank in the early 90′s). Of course lenders complied with this idiotic central planning scheme. Yet, when the bottom falls out the same government, with the help of our corrupt media vilifies the corporations. Who REALLY made out like bandits? Government officials and entities. Have you ever asked yourself what happens to the billions upon billions – yes billions upon billions – the government receives year in and year out by shaking down companies?

May 20, 2014 2:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.