N.Y. Times publisher tried for 'amicable' split with editor

Tue May 20, 2014 10:51am EDT

Jill Abramson, former Executive Editor of the New York Times, gives the commencement address at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina May 19, 2014. REUTERS/Jason Miczek

Jill Abramson, former Executive Editor of the New York Times, gives the commencement address at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina May 19, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Miczek

Related Topics

(Reuters) - New York Times Co Chairman and Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. said he tried to part ways peacefully with the top leader of the newsroom, Jill Abramson, whom he ousted last week.

"We originally drafted the whole thing to be very amicable," Sulzberger said in an interview with Vanity Fair, his first since he changed the leadership of his paper. "Jill said no."

"It was my hope for Jill that we could make this go away as peacefully as possible." (here)

The frenzy surrounding the story has been anything but quiet since Sulzberger replaced Abramson with her deputy, Dean Baquet, stunning the Times newsroom and close followers of the paper when it was announced last Wednesday.

The volley of accusations over Abramson's firing has come hard and fast. The New Yorker reported that Abramson was paid considerably less than her male predecessor Bill Keller, a charge Sulzberger denies.

On Saturday, Sulzberger issued a staff memo saying he terminated Abramson for her "arbitrary decision-making, a failure to consult and bring colleagues with her, inadequate communication and the public mistreatment of colleagues."

Abramson is the third hand-picked executive that Sulzberger has ousted including Times executive editor Howell Raines and the company's chief executive Janet Robinson.

When asked about his decision-making process, Sulzberger told Vanity Fair: "Am I doing a bad job of picking leaders for The New York Times? I don't think so. Everyone who pretends they have a 100 percent success rate isn't trying hard enough."

At an awards ceremony on Monday night in New York, hosted by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Sulzberger thanked Abramson for being one of the most "forceful voices" in challenging a secretive White House.

Earlier on Monday, Abramson spoke out for the first time during a commencement speech at Wake Forest telling graduates to keep fighting.

"Some of you, and now I'm talking to anybody who has been dumped ... You know the sting of losing and not getting something you badly want. When that happens, show them what you are made of," she said.

(Reporting by Jennifer Saba in New York; Editing by Tom Brown)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
europjoy wrote:
PERSONAL DECAGREEMENT ..
WHEN YOU MAKE FIRST TIME MISTAKE MRS ABRAMSON .. THE CONSEQUENCES DID NOT COME FIRS DAY BUT LAST ..

May 20, 2014 2:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.