New Mexico court upholds insurance coverage for medical pot

ALBUQUERQUE, New Mexico Tue May 20, 2014 8:43pm EDT

Marijuana-based products are displayed at the ''Oregon's Finest'' medical marijuana dispensary in Portland, Oregon April 8, 2014. REUTERS/Steve Dipaola

Marijuana-based products are displayed at the ''Oregon's Finest'' medical marijuana dispensary in Portland, Oregon April 8, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Steve Dipaola

Related Topics

ALBUQUERQUE, New Mexico (Reuters) - An injured mechanic who uses medical marijuana as pain treatment can have his former employer and the company's insurer reimburse him for the drug, a New Mexico appeals court ruled.

The state's Court of Appeals voted unanimously on Monday to uphold a previous workers compensation court decision that also ruled in favor of the 55-year-old former mechanic, who suffered a lower back injury in 2000, according to court papers.

The Santa Fe mechanic's former employer, Ben's Automotive Services, and its insurer, Redwood Fire & Casualty, had objected to reimbursing the man for using medical marijuana as treatment, citing the drug's illegality under federal law.

Albuquerque attorney Peter White, who represents the mechanic, said he is not aware of any other state where a workers compensation board has approved a patient's reimbursement for medical marijuana.

"It's an important decision for workers so seriously injured they would be bound to a lifetime of narcotic medications," White said.

Tamar Todd, a staff attorney with the Drug Policy Alliance, said she had not heard of a similar ruling as this decision by the New Mexico Court of Appeals. "It might be fairly unique," she said.

Medical pot is allowed in New Mexico and 20 other states as well as the District of Columbia, but it remains illegal under federal law. Voters in Washington state and Colorado in 2012 voted to legalize marijuana for recreational use.

New Mexico Court of Appeals Judge James Wechsler's written opinion found the employer and its insurer failed to cite a specific federal law they would be forced to violate by reimbursing the man for his medical marijuana treatment.

Lisa Tourek Mack, an attorney for the insurance company, could not be reached for comment.

The mechanic, Gregory Vialpando, was found by a doctor to suffer from "some of the most extremely high intensity, frequency, and duration of pain," out of thousands of patients he had seen, the ruling stated.

Last year, the worker's compensation board approved Vialpando to receive medical marijuana as treatment.

(Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis and Lisa Shumaker)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
QuidProQuo wrote:
Hmmm… there is some things to be weary of regarding this judgment. I don’t think any company should be forced to keep someone employed who is high while at work. If the employee is out on workman’s comp, fine then no big deal, but the law should never make it so the safety of the workforce is jeopardized because the courts decide its okay to send employees onto job sites under the influence. Do we really want crane operators and train conductors showing up to work stoned? No way. I am a huge proponent of decriminalizing pot and the use of medical marijuana just so long as the use of it does not affect worker safety or create a liability issue for employers.

May 23, 2014 12:56pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.