Bloomberg bashes liberal McCarthyism at Harvard commencement

BOSTON Thu May 29, 2014 5:53pm EDT

1 of 3. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg stands to receive an honorary Doctor of Laws degree as fellow honorary degree recipients musician Aretha Franklin (L) and former United States President George H.W. Bush (R) applaud during the 363rd Commencement Exercises at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts May 29, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Brian Snyder

Related Topics

BOSTON (Reuters) - Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg used his commencement address at Harvard University on Thursday to bash a U.S. academic culture that he described as increasingly intolerant of ideas from outside a narrow liberal spectrum.

Citing the campus protests that caused luminaries including former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and International Monetary Fund head Christine Lagarde to back out of planned speeches, Bloomberg criticized students and faculty for being hostile to ideas that clashed with their own ideologies.

Standing amid the centuries-old stone buildings of Harvard Yard, he compared the atmosphere in U.S. academia to that which prevailed during Senator Joseph McCarthy's 1950s campaign to ferret out Communists in public life.

"In the 1950s the right wing was attempting to repress left-wing ideas," said Bloomberg, who started his career on Wall Street before launching the news and data company that bears his name. "Today on many college campuses it is liberals trying to repress conservative ideas even as conservative faculty members are at risk of becoming an endangered species.

"A university's obligation is not to teach students what to think but to teach students how to think," he said. "That requires listening to the other side, weighing arguments without prejudice."

He noted that during the 2012 presidential election, some 96 percent of political contributions from faculty and staff at Ivy League universities such as Harvard went to Democratic candidate Barack Obama, with few backing Republican Mitt Romney.

Bloomberg's speech followed commencement speech cancellations by Lagarde, who backed out of an address at Smith College after a student petition that criticized the IMF for supporting "imperialist and patriarchal systems," and by Rice, who backed out of speaking at Rutgers University after student protests over her role in the Iraq war.

Bloomberg also mentioned Brandeis University, which dropped plans to award an honorary degree to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali-born women's rights activist who has drawn fire for her sharply worded criticisms of Islam.

Bloomberg, who started out as a Democrat but became a Republican in his initial bid to become the mayor of New York and later became an Independent, since leaving office in January has vowed to spend $50 million of his fortune on a gun-control initiative he intends to stand as a counterweight to the powerful National Rifle Association.

He said that an unwillingness to listen to political opponents has led to gridlock in Washington.

"The two parties decide those questions not by engaging with one another but by trying to shout each other down and by trying to repress and undermine the research that counters their ideology," he said. "The more our universities emulate that model the worse off we will be as a society."

Attendees expressed surprise at the tone of his speech.

"It was more political than I expected," said Tina Schwartz, 36, whose husband graduated from Harvard. She said she appreciated Bloomberg's points about "standing up to the liberals on campus and being more open-minded to speakers."

But Don Louria, a retired medical school professor from Bernardsville, New Jersey, took issue with Bloomberg's reference to Rutgers.

"You still have an obligation to object about actions, but not about opinions," said Louria, who graduated from Harvard in 1949.

(Reporting by Scott Malone; Editing by Leslie Adler)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
wilhelm wrote:
this from the guy who bought himself the mayoralty of the largest city in the USA and forced a revision of the law so that he could hold power for an additional term. oh, and he owns an international news organization.

another example of the rich and powerful deprived of their right to speak.

May 29, 2014 7:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Bakhtin wrote:
To Republicans, every is partisan. They just can’t stop themselves being divisive.

Bloomberg is completely wrong. Academia is not liberal because none of them can think. It is liberal because they are educated and *can* think. The can think, and they have done exactly what he suggests – listened to Republicans, weighed their arguments, and concluded that they make no sense at all.

He is also wrong to call the ‘conservative’ arguments. Conservatives exist all over the world, and they have some credible ideas that make sense. The US Republican clown show is purely a US thing, and it is dishonest to call them conservative.

Bloomberg’s whole argument is exactly the same as the one used by religious radicals like Islamic fundamentalists: –

“Islam/Republicism/whatever is right, but you can’t see that because you don’t understand it, and that is because you haven’t been taught properly”

What they all really mean is that they want more indoctrination and less education.

May 29, 2014 11:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
morbas wrote:
“Today on many college campuses it is liberals trying to repress conservative ideas even as conservative faculty members are at risk of becoming an endangered species.”
17th Century Conservative “..more disposed to suffer than right themselves by resistance.” J.Locke.
I hold this criticism most directly at the TEA faction, secondly at the GOP for not guarding against a TEA oligarchic subversion of our democracy. Bahktin’s comments are intellectually valid.
@Bahktin: “Bloomberg is completely wrong. Academia is not liberal because none of them can think. It is liberal because they are educated and *can* think. The can think, and they have done exactly what he suggests – listened to Republicans, weighed their arguments, and concluded that they make no sense at all.” …
In my view government must be limited in power, based firmly on consent of the people. Politicians are merely given a ‘fiduciary power’, a ‘trust’ to be exercised solely for the good of the people. Trust are rights all on the side of the beneficiary. Trust has been overrun by oligarchic greed and monetary power, the people have lost representation. We can recover by non consecutive term limits, and amending to our right the power to directly vote on issues. The speaker of the house should not be a member of any party, representing a col-legate lower house legislative process.

morbas(i)

May 30, 2014 9:45am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.