U.S. condemns Syrian presidential election as 'a disgrace'

WASHINGTON Tue Jun 3, 2014 3:10pm EDT

A man marks a ballot paper in the country's presidential elections in Aleppo June 3, 2014. REUTERS/George Ourfalian

A man marks a ballot paper in the country's presidential elections in Aleppo June 3, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/George Ourfalian

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States condemned the Syrian presidential election held on Tuesday as "a disgrace" carried out by a government of President Bashar al-Assad that is "detached from reality" amid the country's brutal civil war.

Syrians voted in an election expected to deliver an overwhelming victory for Assad but which his opponents have called a charade.

"Today's presidential election in Syria is a disgrace," State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf told a briefing in Washington.

"Bashar al-Assad has no more credibility today than he did yesterday," Harf added.

She also referred to "the disgusting photos of President Assad voting, acting like this is a real election."

Three years of war have killed more than 160,000 people in Syria.

"Detached from reality and devoid of political participation, the Assad regime's staged election today continued a 40-year family legacy of violent suppression that brutally crushes political dissent and fails to fulfill Syrians' aspirations for peace and prosperity."

(Reporting by Will Dunham; Editing by Jim Loney)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Rahul_Lodha wrote:
USA also had elections during US civil war, was that also a “disgrace”?

Jun 03, 2014 3:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.