U.S. expects more Guantanamo transfers despite Bergdahl controversy

WASHINGTON Thu Jun 5, 2014 7:10pm EDT

The frontier road parallels the security fence leading to the Northeast gate at Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, March 8, 2013.  Picture taken March 8, 2013.  REUTERS/Bob Strong

The frontier road parallels the security fence leading to the Northeast gate at Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, March 8, 2013. Picture taken March 8, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Bob Strong

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration expects more inmates will be transferred from the Guantanamo Bay military prison this year, a U.S. official said on Thursday, despite the political firestorm over the exchange of five Taliban detainees for the last American soldier held in Afghanistan.

"There are a significant number of transfers in the pipeline at various stages, and I think you are going to be seeing substantial progress this year," a senior administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told a briefing for reporters on moves toward closing the base.

The official declined to say how many of the 149 prisoners still at the U.S. detention center at the naval base in Cuba are up for transfer. Seventy-eight - including 58 Yemenis and four Afghans - have been approved to be released without charge.

The detention camp, much-criticized by human rights groups and others, has been back in the spotlight since Saturday when Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, 28, was released after being held for five years by the Taliban, in exchange for five Taliban officials held at Guantanamo for 12 years.

News of the swap, which was arranged without consulting Congress, infuriated many lawmakers, particularly Republicans already skeptical about the avowed intention of President Barack Obama, a Democrat, to close the prison.

Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, accused Obama of using Bergdahl's release "as an opportunity to pursue his legacy of closing Guantanamo Bay" in a column published at Time.com.

After being briefed about a potential swap of five prisoners for Bergdahl in late 2011, Congress passed a law, which Obama signed in early 2012, requiring the White House to give them 30 days' notice of any transfers from Guantanamo.

Lawmakers contend that the Bergdahl swap deal violated that law because they were not given notice of the Guantanamo transfers, underscoring the tough fight ahead of the White House as it seeks to shutter the prison.

Advocates for closing the camp say it violates U.S. principles such as not holding prisoners without charge. It also acts as a recruiting tool for anti-American militants, and is very expensive to keep open.

It costs $2.7 million to $2.8 million per year to keep each detainee at Guantanamo, compared with $78,000 per inmate at the highest security prisons in the United States.

Current U.S. law does not allow any prisoners to be moved to the United States from Guantanamo, for trial in federal courts or any other reason, even medical emergency.

Lawmakers who favor closing the base have repeatedly introduced legislation to allow some transfers to the United States. Most recently, they included such provisions in a defense spending bill currently making its way through Congress. Such legislation has repeatedly failed to pass.

(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Grant McCool)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
SaveRMiddle wrote:
Five most dangerous now free? No reason to not free them all.

Use Gitmo as a resort for Vets and their families.

Jun 05, 2014 8:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Art16 wrote:
Elsewhere I commented: “Also, we now have an Obama Victory Garden of Taliban Dragon’s Teeth waiting to be watered, nurtured, and sprout into more vicious murderers of more Afghan people. Neat, huh?

If there are more tricks up Junior High Obama’s sleeves, The Obama Victory Garden of Taliban Dragon’s Teeth will surely grow and prosper and send Afghanistan back about 1500 years, or so. Is this really what the American People want? Haven’t we been disgraced enough with this imposter posing as President? Can Congress, reassign him to be the new Commanding something in Afghanistan, all by himself, with no troops?

Jun 05, 2014 9:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
dd606 wrote:
I’m sure all the guys that are left will come out and become model citizens, and won’t hold any kind of grudge at all.

A recruiting tool for anti-American militants? They didn’t seem to have any problem finding nuts to blow themselves up before those guys were put there.

Just more irrational ideas from irrational people. I think all the bleeding hearts should have them come and work at their homes. Give them a spare room and have them take care of their kids and stuff… Since they’re such great guys, I’m sure nothing will go wrong.

Jun 05, 2014 10:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.