Pennsylvania voters support fracking, but not in parks: poll

HARRISBURG Pa. Fri Jun 6, 2014 5:28pm EDT

Related Topics

HARRISBURG Pa. (Reuters) - Pennsylvania voters are in favor of using the fracking technique to produce natural gas in the state, but oppose Republican Governor Tom Corbett's plan to drill under state parks and forests, a Quinnipiac University poll revealed on Friday.

Some 58 percent of the state's voters support fracking, a process in which rock formations are cracked and infused with chemical-laced water to extract natural gas. Thirty three percent oppose it.

But a similar majority, 57 percent, said they would oppose fracking under state parks and forests, with 36 percent supporting the idea. Opinion is split largely along party lines, with 71 percent of Democrats and 58 percent of Independents opposed, and 58 percent of Republicans in favor.

"People in Pennsylvania have a high regard for the natural gas industry," said Terry Madonna, a professor of public affairs at Franklin & Marshall College. "But they want it done in an environmentally sound way."

Some 39 percent of voters said Corbett's executive order of May 23 allowing park drilling would make them less likely to vote for him when he seeks re-election in November.

The order is also under attack in the state’s Commonwealth Court, where a judge is expected to rule later this month on a petition from a coalition of conservation groups to stop the drilling with an injunction.

Corbett is counting on $75 million from the drilling to help get the state out of a budget hole in the coming fiscal year.

His office did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the poll results.

Quinnipiac said the poll of 1,308 registered voters was conducted from May 29 to June 2. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.7 percentage points.

(Editing by Scott Malone and Gunna Dickson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
AnotherNobody wrote:
What´s the sense of having a park if it can be exploited for natural gas?

Jun 07, 2014 1:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
tougar wrote:
extrapolating the opinions of 1300 to a population of about 13 million. I’m guessing the 2.7% margin of error has it’s own margin of error.

Jun 09, 2014 12:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
@tougar

I know it sounds strange to people who have not worked through the math of it, but a 1300-person sample — property obtained with true randomness and access to the voting population — is a very strong indication of how 13 million people feel at the time the poll was taken. That’s why polling is a practical and affordable business for media and political consultancy.

Jun 09, 2014 4:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Photo

California's historic drought

With reservoirs at record lows, California is in the midst of the worst drought in decades.  Slideshow